The Southeast Asian body vows to monitor the plight of the ethnic group unwanted in Burma and Bangladesh.

The head of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) raised the issue of the Rohingyas with the top diplomats of Burma and Bangladesh on Friday, vowing to monitor the Muslim ethnic group unwanted by both countries.

ASEAN Secretary-General Surin Pitsuwan has taken “a personal interest” in the Rohingyas and had spoken directly to Burmese and Bangladeshi representatives during a meeting of the grouping’s foreign ministers in Cambodia’s Phnom Penh this week, according to the ASEAN website.

Both Burmese Foreign Minister Wunna Maung Lwin and his Bangladeshi counterpart Dipu Moni agreed to cooperate and keep ASEAN informed on the status of the ethnic group following deadly ethnic violence between Rohingyas and Buddhist Rakhines in western Burma in June.

"We will keep our eyes and ears on the plight of these unfortunate people," Surin said on completion of the ASEAN meeting and talks between ASEAN ministers and their foreign counterparts.

He said he appreciated the concern of the ASEAN people for the “sufferings” of the Rohingyas, who number around 800,000 in Burma and are considered to be some of the world's most persecuted minorities.

Aside from Burma, Rohingyas also live as migrant workers in many of the other ASEAN states—Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam.

Burmese President Thein Sein had requested the United Nations refugee agency this week place Rohingyas in refugee camps or send them out of the country. His request was immediately refused by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

Many of Burma’s Rohingyas have lived in the country for generations, but Thein Sein said that the ethnic minority is made up of illegal immigrants from Bangladesh and that “we cannot accept them here.”

Bangladesh, where an estimated 300,000 Rohingyas live, has turned back boatloads of the oppressed group arriving on its shores since the outbreak of the unrest.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who was also in Phnom Penh this week attending the ASEAN meeting, met with Thein Sein in Siem Reap ahead of a U.S.-ASEAN business forum and raised the issue of the Rohingyas with the Burmese leader, officials said.

A senior State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that Clinton stressed Washington’s willingness “to be supportive of help with internally displaced people (IDP),” referring to the Muslim ethnic group.

The official said that Thein Sein had not responded directly, other than to say that the general situation with regard to the Rohingyas had been “very dangerous for the country” and that Burma “needed continued help and support with IDPs.”

“They talked about the situation … He talked about how difficult it had been. She offered that if more support was needed with IDPs that we could be supportive,” the official said.

UN Request

Violence between Rohingyas and the Rakhines that flared in June has left some 78 people dead and 90,000 displaced and living in camps, according to government statistics.

The clashes were sparked after an ethnic Rakhine woman was allegedly raped and killed by three Rohingya men in late May. On June 3, a group of Rakhine vigilantes attacked and killed 10 Rohingyas on a bus they believed were responsible for the woman’s death.

On June 8, thousands of Rohingyas rioted in Maungdaw, destroying Rakhine property, burning homes, and causing an unknown number of deaths. In the aftermath, Rohingyas carried out similar attacks on Rakhines elsewhere around the state.

ASEAN foreign ministers had earlier tasked the ASEAN Secretariat to monitor the situation of the Rohingyas and keep them updated after thousands were turned away from countries where they sought asylum.

According to the UNHCR, around one million Rohingyas are now thought to live outside Burma, but they have not been welcomed by a third country.

အဆုိပါဆႏၵျပသူမ်ားသည္ျမန္မာသံရုံးအတြင္း၀င္ေရာက္ျခင္းမရွိပဲကုလသမဂၢရုံးေရွ႕တြင္ဆႏၵျပရန္ခ်ီတက္

သြားခဲ့ၾကသည္ဇြန္လတြင္ရခုိင္ျပည္နယ္တြင္ရခုိင္ဗုဒၶဘာသာ၀င္မ်ားႏွင့္ရုိဟင္ဂ်ာအပါအ၀င္မြတ္စလင္မ်ား

အၾကားအဓိကရုဏ္းျဖစ္ပြားၿပီး လူေပါင္းမ်ားစြာေသဆုံးခဲ့ရသည့္အျပင္ ေထာင္ေပါင္းမ်ားစြာအုိးမဲ့အိမ္မဲ့ျဖစ္ခဲ့ရသည္။ 

ရုိဟင္ဂ်ာလူမ်ဳိးရွစ္သိန္းခန္႔ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံတြင္ေနထုိင္ၿပီး ကမာၻေပၚတြင္အဖိႏွိပ္ခံရဆုံးလူနည္းစုျဖစ္သည္။
သမၼတသိန္းစိန္မွကုလသမဂၢသုိ႔ေျပာၾကားရာတြင္တုိင္းရင္းသားမဟုတ္ေသာတရားမ၀င္၀င္ေရာက္လာေသာ ရုိဟင္ဂ်ာမ်ားကုိလက္ခံရန္လုံး၀မျဖစ္ႏုိင္ေၾကာင္း၊ ဒုကၡသည္စခန္းတြင္ထား၍ျဖစ္ေစ (သုိ႔မဟုတ္) တတိယႏုိင္ငံမ်ားသုိ႔ပုိ႔ ျခင္းအေျဖရွာရန္ေျပာၾကားခဲ့သည္။

ကုလသမဂ ၢမွမျဖစ္ႏုိင္ေၾကာင္းေျပာၾကား၍သမၼတ၏အဆုိကုိပယ္ခ်ခဲ့သည္။ 

ကုလသမဂၢမွေျပာၾကားရာတြင္ဆယ္စုႏွစ္မ်ားစြာဖိႏွိပ္ထားၿပီး၊ ပုိင္ဆုိင္မႈေရးရာမ်ား၊ ပညာေရးဆုိင္ရာ၊ အမႈထမ္းျခင္းဆုိင္ရာ ႏွင့္အျခားေသာလူ႔အခြင့္အေရးမ်ားကုိတားဆီးပိတ္ပင္ထားေၾကာင္းေျပာၾကားခဲ့သည္။

RB News Desk

Burma Campaign UK (BCUK) supports human rights for the Rohingya people. For Burma Campaign UK to make such a statement shouldn’t be surprising or controversial.

We are a human rights organization working on Burma. How could anyone disagree that the Rohingya people are entitled to full human rights and the normal rights and protections under international law?

But some people see that statement as such an outrage that Burma Campaign UK staff deserve to be raped and killed. We need to be “punished,” “taught a lesson” and “hung.” All these views and many more – many vicious and obscene – have been emailed to us or posted on YouTube and Facebook.

The level of abuse, hatred and anger directed against Burma Campaign UK and other organizations who say that Rohingya should have human rights, and which work with Rohingya to defend their human rights, has been astonishing.

There has even been a demonstration in Rangoon, outside the British Embassy, which, as well as attacking exiled media in almost exactly the same way the dictatorship used to, accused Burma Campaign UK of “propaganding” for the Rohingya. I doubt anyone in that protest could cite an example of us “propaganding,” whatever that means, but in the current hysteria some people seem willing to believe anything they hear as long as it is anti-Rohingya.

That they were allowed to protest at all was a good sign, but have those people also used their new freedoms to protest for the release of hundreds of political prisoners still in jail, or to protest against the Burmese Army raping women in Kachin State?

The hysteria has gone to such levels that some people from Burma are claiming, and, incredibly, others are believing, that Burma Campaign UK somehow stirred up the violence which broke out in Arakan State. They claim that we are responsible for the violence that has taken place

Burma Campaign UK has long faced criticism for supporting human rights for the Rohingya, and for a variety of sometimes bizarre reasons, as well as what may be genuine misunderstandings.

One lie being spread around on blogs, emails and sites like Facebook is that we are making money out of working for Rohingya. Burma Campaign UK has never received a grant for working on Rohingya issues. In any case, all of Burma Campaign UK’s income is spent on campaigning for human rights and democracy in Burma. We are a nonprofit organization.

Another lie in a similar vein is that Middle East countries fund us. Sometimes it is implied we are funded as part of a Middle East plot to take over Burma and turn it into a Muslim country. It is even claimed that there is evidence for this. When Rohingya activists attended an Organisation of Islamic Conference meeting and set up the Arakan Rohingya Union, pictures were posted on Arakan blogs of the delegation, with captions and an article saying I was in the picture, and this was proof that I and Burma Campaign UK were taking Middle East money. 

The only problem was, I wasn’t in the picture. I didn’t even know the event was taking place. The person in the picture was Harn Yawnghwe from the Euro Burma Office. At the time we thought it funny that people making these attacks could not even tell the difference between a Shan Prince and myself, we never expected it to be taken so seriously, but this lie took hold. It was spread on email and more blogs, on Facebook, and people actually believed it. On my recent trip to Burma, even very senior democracy leaders in Rangoon talked about it.

One common lie is that we support the Rohingya having a state of their own. We have never said that, and although some Rohingya organizations talked about this decades ago, we have never even heard any Rohingya organization saying they want their own state. There seems to be some great misunderstanding that if the Rohingya are recognized as an ethnic group, somehow that will entitle them to land or their own state. This simply isn’t true, and Burma Campaign UK has never said we support that.

Another reason we are attacked over Rohingya issues is that we have a Muslim staff member. From the moment Wai Hnin Pwint Thon joined Burma Campaign UK, messages started to be left on our Facebook Page by people from Burma, attacking her because she is a Muslim.

It was not until years later when she was pictured at a demonstration protesting against the dictatorship’s abuses of the Rohingya that it became Rohingya linked abuse posted on our Page. But now Wai Hnin Pwint Thon is subject to torrents of abuse, much more than our non-Muslim staff and volunteers who were on the same demonstration as she was, and have been on other protests with Rohingya as well.

Lies posted and spread about Wai Hnin Pwint Thon include that she is secretly Rohingya (she isn’t), she has been accused of working with Rohingya Solidarity Organization (she doesn’t), of wanting to create a Caliphate in Burma (she doesn’t), of taking money from Rohingya (she hasn’t), and even that she has had several children with different Rohingya men (she hasn’t). She has faced not just lies but abuse, much of it sexual in nature.

Many people seem to think that any lie or story they hear about someone with any connection to supporting Rohingya human rights is justification for personal attacks, abuse and even threats. Given that this is the way their leaders behave, perhaps that is not surprising.

Around a year ago, I tried to engage Dr. Aye Chan in a conversation on why he and his followers spent much more time criticising Rohingya than they did the dictatorship. Aye Chan was incapable of having the discussion without repeatedly making personal attacks. The email conversation was forwarded to various email groups, and my in-box was flooded with abusive emails. When I asked Aye Chan to ask his supporters not to use personal abuse and threats, and to condemn those who do, he repeatedly refused to do so. When leaders not only fail to condemn abusive and personal attacks, but even make personal attacks themselves, their followers will copy their behaviour.

More recently we have been accused of being pro-Rohingya. I am still not exactly sure what that means. Certainly we are pro-human rights for the Rohingya, how could we or anyone else who believes in democracy and human rights not be?

But the implication is that we are pro-Rohingya, and therefore somehow anti-Rakhine. It is worrying how so many people now see the two as automatically going together. Burma Campaign UK supports the human rights of everyone in Burma, and that includes Rohingya and Rakhine. To talk about Rohingya having human rights does not make us anti-Rakhine. We have campaigned on many Rakhine related issues, including Shwe gas, Rakhine political prisoners, and were one of the few campaign groups actively campaigning for the 34 Rakhine and Karen prisoners in jail in India.

Burma Campaign UK has been criticised for not doing enough on Rakhine issues, and this is also cited as evidence of some kind of pro-Rohingya bias. But we have never refused any request when we have been asked to work on any Rakhine related issue by any Rakhine community or human rights group. We would do more on Arakan issues, but some members of the Arakan community in the UK will not work with us because we support human rights for the Rohingya. When we tried to meet with Arakan community leaders, it took months to arrange, and only one person turned up. In the past we made repeated offers of all kinds of training and support to the Arakan community in UK, and to groups in exile, and none have been taken up.

Burma Campaign UK was also fiercely criticized for circulating information from the Burmese Rohingya Organisation UK about the recent violence. Circulating information on behalf of human rights groups is a major part of our work. Every year we circulate media releases, briefings and reports from dozens of organisations from Burma, and from international NGOs.

If any organization working on Arakan human rights had also provide a briefing with information not being reported, we would have circulated that as well. But they didn’t.

I have tried to have some conversations with some of the people criticizing myself and Burma Campaign UK for bias, asking them for examples. So far no one has been able to provide a single one. Yet the perception remains.

It seems impossible to dispel the belief by some that working for Rohingya human rights means bias against Rakhine. From our perspective, it seems that this is a deliberate tactic of extremists to polarize the debate and incite more hatred and intolerance. 

Any public comment or photograph relating to the Rohingya seems to act as a lightning rod for more abuse and threats, and this article will probably result in the same. 

But I hope some people may take the time to consider the truth. What possible reason or interest could Burma Campaign UK have in being biased?

Our agenda is solely human rights and democracy. We have been working relentlessly for this for more than 20 years. Why have people been so ready to believe lies and bad things about people who have worked so hard to support their cause? And why do people not simply ask what the truth is before passing on lies and gossip?

Even for those who disagree with Burma Campaign UK, is it right that we should receive threats and abuse just for having a different opinion than them? That is the approach and mind set of the dictatorship. It shouldn’t be the way things are done in a democracy. People do need to ask themselves why they are so ready to believe these lies.

The terrible events in Arakan State in the past month and the reaction of many people to those events, casts a long shadow over Burma. Violence and intolerance took hold. Is this the kind of Burma people want to see in the future? 

Isn’t one of the main reasons for having a democracy that disagreements can be debated and settled politically, not through violence and threats?

Burma’s democracy movement is an anti-dictatorship movement, but it must also be a movement for human rights, for tolerance and for equality.

Mark Farmaner is director of Burma Campaign UK.

Source Here:

July 13, 2012 

Protested outside the Myanmar embassy in the Indonesian capital Jakarta on Friday to “stop the genocide” of Rohingya Muslims in the wake of deadly communal unrest.

The hard-liners left without entering the embassy and proceeded to a UN building to protest.
Communal violence between ethnic Buddhist Rakhine and local Muslims, including the Rohingya, swept Myanmar’s Rakhine state in June, leaving dozens dead and tens of thousands homeless.

Around 800,000 Rohingyas live in Myanmar and are considered to be some of the world’s most persecuted minorities.

Myanmar President Thein Sein told the UN on Thursday it was “impossible to accept the illegally entered Rohingyas, who are not our ethnicity,” saying they should be sent to refugee camps or be deported.

Decades of discrimination have left the Rohingya stateless, with Myanmar implementing restrictions on their movement and withholding land rights, education and public services, the UN says.

Source : Agence France-Presse

လြန္ခဲ့ေသာေႏြဦးအခ်ိန္ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံ၌ဒီမုိကေရစီပန္းပြင့္ေနမႈျဖင့္ကမာၻကုိဖမ္းစားခဲ့သည္။ သုိ႔ေသာ္ယခု သုံးလ အၾကာတြင္ဒီမုိကေရစီအေရး လႈပ္ရွားသူ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္လႊတ္ေတာ္ အမတ္အျဖစ္ေရြးခ်ယ္ ခံရၿပီး တစ္လ အၾကာတြင္ေအာ္စလုိၿမဳိ႕သုိ႔ ၁၉၉၁ ႏုိဗယ္ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရး ဆုကုိ အခ်ိန္ေႏွာင္း၍ လက္ခံရန္သြား သည့္အခ်ိန္တြင္ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံ၌ေခါင္းေလာင္းသံျမည္ေနပါသည္။ ဘဂၤလားေဒ့ရွ္ႏုိင္ငံႏွင့္နယ္စပ္ျဖစ္ေသာ ရခုိင္ျပည္နယ္၏ရြာမ်ားတြင္ ဇြန္လ၌ရုိဟင္ဂ်ာ ဟုေခၚေသာမြတ္စလင္ မ်ားကုိလူမ်ဳိးေရးဘာသာေရး ခြဲျခားဖိႏွိပ္ သတ္ျဖတ္မႈမ်ားစတင္ခဲ့သည္။ ဤသည္မွာျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံ၏ ဒီမုိကေရစီအသြင္ ကူးေျပာင္းမႈ ကာလ၏ရုပ္ဆုိးေသာ လကၡဏာျဖစ္ၿပီး ပန္းပြင့္ျမင္ေနရေသာ္လည္း ပန္း၏နိမိတ္မ ေကာင္းျခင္းျဖစ္သည္။

ရုိဟင္ဂ်ာမ်ားကုိရက္စက္မႈသည္ယခုမွမဟုတ္ေပ။ ထုိသူမ်ားသည္ဗုဒၶဘာ သာအမ်ားစုေနထုိင္ေသာ နယ္ေျမတြင္ႏွိပ္စက္ညွင္းပန္းျခင္း၊ လ်စ္လ်ဴရွဳခံရျခင္း၊ ဖိႏွိပ္ခံရျခင္းတုိ႔ကုိ ၁၉၄၈ လြတ္လပ္ေရးသည့္ အခ်ိန္မွ စ၍ႀကဳံေတြ႔ေနရသည္။ အေျခခံဥပေဒမ်ားသည္ထုိသူမ်ားကုိ ႏုိင္ငံသားျဖစ္ရန္ အခြင့္အေရးမ်ား ကုိပိတ္ပင္ထားၿပီး၊ ထုိသုိ႔ျဖစ္ရျခင္းမွာထုိသူတုိ႔၏ဘုိးဘြားဘီဘင္မ်ားသည္ ၁၉ ရာစု၌ၿဗိတိန္ကုိလုိနီလက္ ေအာက္ မွျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံဟုျဖစ္လာသည့္အခ်ိန္တြင္မေနထုိင္ခဲ့ျခင္းေၾကာင့္ဟုဆုိသည္။ (ရုိဟင္ ဂ်ာျပႆ နာတြင္ အေခ်အတင္အျငင္းခုံေနမႈတစ္ခု) ယခုအခ်ိန္တြင္စစ္အာဏာရွင္ စနစ္ႀကီးၿပဳိကြဲရန္ အစျပဳေနေသာ္ လည္း ရုိဟင္ဂ်ာမ်ားအတြက္ေျပာင္းလဲရန္တစ္စုံတစ္ရာသေကၤတမျမင္ရေပ။ ျမန္မာမ်ား သည္ ထုိသူမ်ားကုိ ဇာတ္လမ္းဆင္ရန္ႀကဳိးစားေနၾကပါသည္။

ယခုျဖစ္ပြားေသာအၾကမ္းဖက္မႈႀကီးကုိလုိက္ရွာလွ်င္ဗုဒၶဘာသာအမ်ဳိးသမီးတစ္ဦးကုိေမလေႏွာင္းပုိင္းတြင္အဓမၼက်င့္၍သတ္ျဖတ္ျခင္းေၾကာင့္ ျဖစ္ၿပီး၊ ထုိအတြက္မြတ္စလင္သုံးဦးကုိရဲမ်ားမွဖမ္း ဆီးေၾကာင္း အစီရင္ခံခဲ့ သည္။ ထုိကိစၥေနာက္ပုိင္းတြင္ ဆူပူေသာင္းက်န္းေသာလူအုပ္မွ ရုိဟင္ဂ်ာမ်ားႏွင့္ အျခားေသာ မြတ္စလင္မ်ားကုိတုိက္ခုိက္သတ္ျဖတ္ခဲ့ရာ လူေပါင္းမ်ားစြာေသေၾကခဲ့သည္။ ႏုိင္ငံတကာ လြတ္ၿငိမ္း ခ်မ္းသာခြင့္ အဖြဲ႔၊ လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးေစာင့္ၾကည့္ေရး အဖြဲ႔တုိ႔မွသိရွိရာတြင္ လုံၿခဳံေရး တပ္ဖြဲ႔၀င္မ်ားဦးေဆာင္၍ မြတ္စလင္မ်ားကုိအစုလုိက္အၿပဳံလုိက္ဖမ္းဆီး ျခင္း၊ ေထာင္ေပါင္း မ်ားစြာေသာ အိမ္မ်ား ဖ်က္ဆီးျခင္း တုိ႔ျပဳလုပ္ခဲ့ၿပီး၊ ရုိဟင္ဂ်ာမ်ားဘက္မွ အႀကီးအက်ယ္ပ်က္ဆီးဆုံး ရွဳံးခဲ့ရသည္။ အုိးမဲ့အိမ္မဲ့ ျဖစ္ခဲ့ရေသာ ရုိဟင္ဂ်ာမ်ား မွႀကဳိးစား၍ နတ္ျမစ္ကုိျဖတ္ေက်ာ္ၿပီး အိမ္နီးခ်င္းႏုိင္ငံ ဘဂၤလားေဒ့ရွ္ သုိ႔ သြား ရာလမ္းတြင္ လူအခ်ဳိ႕ေသဆုံးခဲ့ရသည္။ 

ျမန္မာမီဒီယာမ်ားမွအဓိကရုဏ္းျဖစ္ပြားရာအေစာပုိင္းတြင္ရုိဟင္ဂ်ာမ်ားကုိအၾကမ္းဖက္သမားမ်ား၊ သစၥာေဖာက္ မ်ား အျဖစ္ဇာတ္ လမ္းဆင္၍ ကုိးကားျပခဲ့သည္။ ဇြန္လအလယ္ပုိင္းတြင္ အစုိးရမွအဓိက ရုဏ္းႀကီးရပ္တန္႔ရန္အေၾကာင္းျပၿပီး ေဒသတြင္းအေရးေပၚအေျခအေနေၾကညာ ခဲ့သည္။ သုိ႔ေသာ္ထုိ အေျခအေနအား နယ္စပ္လုံၿခဳံေရး တပ္ဖြဲ႔မ်ားကုိအိမ္မ်ားမီးရွဳိ႕ရန္၊ လူမ်ားသတ္ရန္ႏွင့္ရုိဟင္ဂ်ာ မ်ား ကုိေနအိမ္ မ်ား ဖယ္ရွား ၿပီးရြာမွာႏွင္ထုတ္ရန္အသုံးျပဳခဲ့ျခင္းျဖစ္သည္။ ၾကာသပေတးေန႔တြင္ သမၼတသိန္းစိန္ မွ ရုိဟင္ဂ်ာမ်ားကုိႏုိင္ငံအတြင္းႏွင္ထုတ္၍ေသာ္လည္း ေကာင္း (သုိ႔မဟုတ္) ကုလသမ ဂၢမွျပန္ လည္ေန ရာခ်ထားျခင္းျဖင့္ေသာ္ လည္းေကာင္းျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံတြင္ျဖစ္ ပြားေနေသာ ကပ္ဆုိက္ေနေသာ  ကာလကုိ  အဆုံးသတ္ႏုိင္မည္ဟု ကုလသမဂၢကုိ အႀကံျပဳခဲ့ေသာ္လည္း ကုလသမဂၢမွ လ်င္ျမန္စြာ ပယ္ခ်ခဲ့သည္။

ဤသည္မွာလူမ်ဳိးေရးဂုိဏ္းဂဏခြဲ၍ျဖစ္ပြားေသာအၾကမ္းဖက္မႈမဟုတ္၊ ႏုိင္ငံေတာ္မွေထာက္ခံအားေပး ခဲ့ေသာ လူမ်ဳိးတုန္းသတ္ျဖတ္ျခင္းျဖစ္ၿပီး ကမာၻ႔ႏုိင္ငံမ်ားမွရပ္တန္႔ရန္ ျမန္မာေခါင္းေဆာင္မ်ား သုိ႔ဖိအား မေပးၾကေပ။ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္မွ လည္းတစုံ တရာေျပာၾကားျခင္း မရွိခဲ့ေပ။

ဇြန္လအလယ္ပုိင္းတြင္ကၽြႏု္ပ္သည္စာနယ္ဇင္းသမားမ်ားႏွင့္အတူနယ္စပ္ၿမဳိ႕သုိ႔သြားေရာက္၍ ဘ ဂၤ လားေဒ့ရွ္ ရွိ ရြာမ်ား တြင္ေလွစီး၍ေရာက္လာ ၾကေသာရုိဟင္ဂ်ာမ်ား ၏တုန္လႈပ္ဖြယ္ဇာတ္လမ္း မ်ားကုိ သိခဲ့ ရသည္။ ထုိသူတုိ႔ေျပာၾကားရာတြင္ ရဟတ္ယာဥ္မွပစ္ခြင္းသည္ကုိႀကဳံခဲ့ရၿပီး ေလွေျခာက္စင္းမွ သုံးစင္းေပ်ာက္ဆုံးခဲ့သည္။ ခရီးစဥ္ေလးရက္ အတြင္း ကေလးအခ်ဳိ႕ေရနစ္ခဲ့ၿပီး အခ်ဳိ႕မွာ ဆာေလာင္ မႈေၾကာင့္ေသဆုံးခဲ့ သည္။ ဘဂၤလားေဒ့ရွ္သုိ႔ေရာက္ သည့္မိသား စုမ်ားမွျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံ သုိ႔ျပန္ လည္၍ႏွင္ ထုတ္ျခင္းခံရသည္ဟုေျပာသည္။ မိဘမ်ားႏွင့္ကြဲသြားေသာ ကေလးမ်ားသည္ရြာမ်ား အတြင္းရွိအိမ္မ်ား သုိ႔သြားေရာက္၍အကာအကြယ္ယူၾကၿပီး၊ အခ်ဳိ႕ကေလးမ်ားမွာဆာေလာင္မႈအျပည့္ျဖင့္တေနရာ ရာတြင္ ပုန္းေအာင္း ေနျခင္း (သုိ႔မဟုတ္) ဒုစရုိက္ဂုိဏ္းမ်ား၏သားေကာင္မ်ားျဖစ္သြားၾကသည္။ နယ္စပ္လုံၿခဳံေရး မ်ားမွေမြးကင္းစကေလးကုိ ေတြ႕ရေသာအခါ၊ ေဆး၀ါးကုသေပးၿပီးေနာက္ကေလးငယ္ကုိ ယာယီကာ ကြယ္ေပးသည့္ အေနျဖင့္နယ္ေျမခံ ငါးဖမ္းသမားႏွင့္ထားခဲ့သည္။

အဘယ္ေၾကာင့္ဤဖိႏွိပ္သတ္ျဖတ္မႈသည္ႏုိင္ငံတကာကုိေဒါသမျဖစ္ေစခဲ့သနည္း။ အေမရိ ကန္ျပည္ေထာင္ စု၊ ဥေရာပသမဂၢႏွင့္ကေနဒါႏုိင္ငံတုိ႔ သည္ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံ၏ ဒီမုိကေရစီအသြင္ ကူးေျပာင္းေရးကုိ လက္ခံ လုိက္ၿပီးေနာက္ ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံသည္ရင္းႏွီးျမွပ္ႏွံရန္ပန္းတုိင္တစ္ခုျဖစ္လာသည္။ ၁၉၈၈ ခုႏွစ္မွ စတင္ခဲ့ေသာ စီးပြားေရးပိတ္ဆု႔ိမႈမ်ားကုိရုပ္သိမ္းခဲ့သည္။ (ထုိပိတ္ဆုိ႔မႈသည္ တရုတ္၊အိႏၵိယ၊ေတာင္ ကုိးရီယား ထုိင္း စကၤာပူႏုိင္ငံ မ်ားႏွင့္ႏုိင္ငံမ်ဳိးစုံ ပါ၀င္ေသာေရနံကုမၸဏီမ်ားကုိျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံႏွင့္စီးပြားေရးလုပ္ ကုိင္ျခင္းမ်ား ကုိမတား ဆီးႏုိင္ခဲ့ေပ။) လြန္ခဲ့ေသာႏွစ္ေႏွာင္းပုိင္းတြင္ အေမရိကန္ႏုိင္ငံျခားေရး၀န္ႀကီး ဟီလာရီကလင္တန္ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံသုိ႔အလည္အပတ္ေရာက္စဥ္တြင္ပထမအဆင့္အေနျဖင့္ဒီမုိကေရစီစနစ္က်င့္ သုံးေရး၊ ႏွစ္ႏုိင္ငံဆက္ဆံေရးခုိင္ျမဲေရး အတြက္လုိအပ္ မည့္အေျခအေနမ်ား ၊ တုိင္းရင္းသားျပႆနာ မ်ားကုိအဆုံးသတ္ရန္တုိ႔ကုိခ်မွတ္ခဲ့သည္။ 

ရုိဟင္ဂ်ာမ်ား၏အတိဒုကၡမ်ားသည္ႏုိင္ငံမဲ့ျခင္း၊ ႏုိင္ငံသားျဖစ္မႈျငင္းပယ္ခံရျခင္းတုိ႔ေၾကာင့္ျဖစ္ၿပီး ဤသည္ အတြက္ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံတြင္တာ၀န္ရွိ သည္။ ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံ၏အသြင္ကူးေျပာင္းေရး ကာလကုိ ထိန္းခ်ဳပ္လ်က္ရွိေသာစစ္အရာရွိႀကီးကဲ့သုိ႔ ၾသဇာအာဏာမရွိေသာ္ျငားလည္း၊ အေနာက္ႏုိင္ငံမ်ား တြင္ တက္ေရာက္ခဲ့ေသာအခမ္းအနားမ်ား၌ေမးျမန္းရာတြင္ေရွာင္တိမ္းသကဲ့သုိ႔ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ အေနျဖင့္ မေရွာင္တိမ္းသင့္ေပ။ သူမအေနႏွင့္သူမ၏အသံ၊ ဂုဏ္သတင္းမ်ားကုိ အသုံးျပဳ ၍ႏုိင္ငံ သားျဖစ္ ခြင့္ လူသားမ်ား၏အေျခခံအခြင့္အေရးျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း ေျပာဆုိသင့္သည္။ ဇူလုိင္လ (၅) ရက္ေန႔တြင္ အစၥလာ မစ္ ပူးေပါင္းေဆာင္ရြက္ေရးအဖြဲ႔ အေထြေထြအတြင္းေရးမွဴးခ်ဳပ္ Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu မွသူမထံသုိ႔ အၾကမ္းဖက္မႈႀကီးအဆုံးသတ္ရန္အတြက္ကူညီေပးရန္ေမတၱာရပ္ခံခဲ့သည္။

ဘဂၤလားေဒ့ရွ္ႏုိင္ငံအေနႏွင့္ပုိ၍လုပ္ေပးႏုိင္သည္မွာေသခ်ာသည္။ ၎၏ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံႏွင့္ျမစ္နယ္နိမိတ္သည္ ကာကြယ္ထားျခင္းမရွိေသာ ေၾကာင့္ေထာင္ေပါင္းမ်ားစြာေသာရုိဟင္ဂ်ာမ်ားသည္ညအခ်ိန္တြင္ေရကူး၍ (သုိ႔မဟုတ္) ေလွခတ္၍လာၾကသည္။ ယခုတရား၀င္ (သုိ႔မဟုတ္) တရားမ၀င္ေနထုိင္ၾကေသာဒုကၡသည္မ်ား သည္ယခင္ ကထုိကဲ့သုိ႔ေရာက္ရွိခဲ့ေသာ္ျငားလည္း ယခုႏွစ္တြင္စုၿပဳံေအာတုိက္ေရာက္ရွိလာမည္ကုိ စုိးရိမ္ေသာေၾကာင့္ လက္ခံရန္တြန္႔ဆုတ္ခဲ့သည္။ ဘဂၤလားေဒ့ရွ္ႏုိင္ငံသားအခ်ဳိ႕တြင္လည္းထုိစုိးရိမ္မႈေၾကာင့္ ရုိဟင္ဂ်ာဆန္႔က်င္ေရးမ်ားျဖစ္လာ ခဲ့သည္။ အစပုိင္းတြင္ဘဂၤလားေဒ့ရွ္ အစုိးရမွဒုကၡသည္မ်ားကုိ အကူအညီလုံး၀မေပးပဲဖိအားေပး၍ႏွင္ထုတ္ခဲ့သည္။ ရြာသားအခ်ဳိ႕ကုိဒုကၡသည္ မ်ားကုိေနထုိင္ ရန္ေပးခဲ့ေသာေၾကာင့္အစုိးရမွဖမ္းဆီးအေရးယူၿပီးေနာက္ပုိင္းတြင္ ဒုကၡသည္မ်ားကုိႏွင္ မထုတ္မွီလူမႈေရး အကူအညီမ်ားေပးခဲ့ သည္။ ဘဂၤလားေဒ့ရွ္ႏုိင္ငံအေနႏွင့္ႏုိင္ငံ တကာမွတုိက္ တြန္းေန သကဲ့သုိ႔ဒုကၡ သည္မ်ား ကုိယခင္ႏွစ္မ်ားတြင္ေနထုိင္ခြင့္ေပးသကဲ့သုိ႔ေပးသင့္ သည္။ 

ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံသုိ႔ကမာၻမွမီးေမာင္းထုိးျပသင့္သည္မိမိတုိ႔၏ကုိယ္ပုိင္ေျမမ်ားတြင္ရာစုႏွစ္မ်ားစြာေနထုိင္ခဲ့ၾကေသာ္လည္း ပုတ္ခတ္ေ၀ဖန္ခံရသည့္ အျပင္ေမာင္းထုတ္ျခင္းခံရၿပီး၊ ေထာင္ေပါင္းမ်ားစြာေသာႏုိင္ငံမဲ့အမ်ဳိးသား အမ်ဳိးသမီးမ်ားသည္ ျမစ္ေခ်ာင္းမ်ားေပၚတြင္ေမ်ာေနၾကသည္။ အေလာင္းမ်ား ကမ္းေျခမ်ား တြင္ရွိေန သည္ကုိ မ်က္ကြယ္ျပဳထားေသာဒီမုိကေရစီႏုိင္ငံကုိစိတ္အားထက္သန္စြာမႀကဳိဆုိသင့္ေပ။ 

စာေရးသူ Moshahida Sultana Ritu သည္ ဒါကာတကၠသုိလ္မွ စီးပြားေရးပညာရွင္ျဖစ္သည္။ ဤေဆာင္းပါး ကုိ ဇူလုိင္လ (၁၃) ရက္ နယူးေယာက္တုိင္းမ္သတင္းစာ စာမ်က္ႏွာ ေအ ၂၃ တြင္ပုံႏုိပ္ ထုတ္ေ၀သည္။

New York Times သတင္းစာတြင္ Moshahida Sutana Ritu ေရးသားေသာ Ethnic Cleansing in Myanmar ကုိဆီေလ်ာ္ေအာင္ ဘာသာျပန္သည္။ အဓိပၸာယ္လႊဲမွားမႈရွိလွ်င္ ဘာသာျပန္သူ၏ အားနည္းခ်က္သာျဖစ္ၿပီး RB ႏွင့္မသက္ဆုိင္ပါ။

ေမယုနဒီ

LAST spring, a flowering of democracy in Myanmar mesmerized the world. But now, three months after the democracy activist Daw Aung San Suu Kyi won a parliamentary seat, and a month after she traveled to Oslo to belatedly receive the 1991 Nobel Peace Prize, an alarm bell is ringing in Myanmar. In the villages of Arakan State, near the Bangladeshi border, a pogrom against a population of Muslims called the Rohingyas began in June. It is the ugly side of Myanmar’s democratic transition — a rotting of the flower, even as it seems to bloom.

Cruelty toward the Rohingyas is not new. They have faced torture, neglect and repression in the Buddhist-majority land since it achieved independence in 1948. Its constitution closes all options for Rohingyas to be citizens, on grounds that their ancestors didn’t live there when the land, once called Burma, came under British rule in the 19th century (a contention the Rohingyas dispute). Even now, as military rulers have begun to loosen their grip, there is no sign of change for the Rohingyas. Instead, the Burmese are trying to cast them out.

The current violence can be traced to the rape and killing in late May of a Buddhist woman, for which the police reportedly detained three Muslims. That was followed by mob attacks on Rohingyas and other Muslims that killed dozens of people. According to Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, state security forces have now conducted mass arrests of Muslims; they destroyed thousands of homes, with the impact falling most heavily on the Rohingyas. Displaced Rohingyas have tried to flee across the Naf River to neighboring Bangladesh; some have died in the effort.

The Burmese media have cited early rioting by Rohingyas and have cast them as terrorists and traitors. In mid-June, in the name of stopping such violence, the government declared a state of emergency. But it has used its border security force to burn houses, kill men and evict Rohingyas from their villages. And on Thursday, President Thein Sein suggested that Myanmar could end the crisis by expelling all of its Rohingyas or by having the United Nations resettle them — a proposal that a United Nations official quickly rejected.

This is not sectarian violence; it is state-supported ethnic cleansing, and the nations of the world aren’t pressing Myanmar’s leaders to stop it. Even Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi has not spoken out.

In mid-June, after some Rohingyas fled by boat to villages in Bangladesh, they told horrifying stories to a team of journalists whom I accompanied to this city near the border. They said they had come under fire from a helicopter and that three of six boats were lost. Some children drowned during the four-day trip; others died of hunger. Once in Bangladesh, they said, the families faced deportation back to Myanmar. But some children who had become separated from their parents made their way to the houses of villagers for shelter; other children may even now be starving in hide-outs or have become prey for criminal networks. Border guards found an abandoned newborn on a boat; after receiving medical treatment, the infant was left in the temporary care of a local fisherman.

Why isn’t this pogrom arousing more international indignation? Certainly, Myanmar has become a destination for capital investment now that the United States, the European Union and Canada have accepted the government’s narrative of democratic transition and have largely lifted the economic sanctions they began applying after 1988 (measures that did not prevent China, India, South Korea, Thailand, Singapore and multinational oil companies from doing business with the Burmese). Still, when Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton visited Myanmar late last year and welcomed its first steps toward democratization, she also set down conditions for strengthening ties, including an end to ethnic violence. 

The plight of the Rohingyas begins with their statelessness — the denial of citizenship itself, for which Myanmar is directly responsible. Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi, though not as powerful as the military officers who control Myanmar’s transition, should not duck questions about the Rohingyas, as she has done while being feted in the West. Instead, she should be using her voice and her reputation to point out that citizenship is a basic right of all humans. On July 5, the secretary general of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, appealed to her to speak up to help end the violence.

To be sure, Bangladesh can do more. Its river border with Myanmar is unprotected; thousands of Rohingyas have been rowing or swimming it at night. But even though Bangladesh has sheltered such refugees in the past — hundreds of thousands of Rohingyas live here now, legally or illegally — it has been reluctant so far this year to welcome them, out of fear of encouraging an overwhelming new influx. Already, such fears have aroused anti-Rohingya sentiment among some Bangladeshis, and initially Bangladesh’s government tried to force the refugees back without assisting them. After some villagers risked arrest by sheltering refugees in their homes, the government began to offer humanitarian aid, before sending them back on their boats. Bangladesh should shelter the refugees as it has in years past, as the international community is urging.

But the world should be putting its spotlight on Myanmar. It should not so eagerly welcome democracy in a country that leaves thousands of stateless men and women floating in a river, their corpses washing up on its shores, after they have been reviled in, and driven from, a land in which their families have lived for centuries.

Moshahida Sultana Ritu, an economist, teaches at the University of Dhaka, in Bangladesh.

Sources Here:

The statement of the President Thein Sein affirms the Government’s premeditated plan and direct involvement in the killing, destruction, rape, extortion, loot and starvation of the Rohingyas in Arakan. It can be considered a case of genocide.

The Rohingyas have a long glorious history in Arakan. There is no doubt the Rohingya population has been in Burma since before the formation of the State. By international law they are NOT ‘stateless’ in Burma. They conform to a genuine and effective link with no other State except Burma. The Government does not wish to recognize Rohingyas’ citizenship does not make them stateless.

The fundamental obligations of the State are to protect all persons within its jurisdictions. It is factually nonsense to call ‘illegally entered Rohingyas’. It is time for Bangladesh to stand up against Burmese Government’s false accusation.

We, therefore, appeal to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon to immediately intervene in the issue in order to save the life, property, honour and human dignity of the Rohingya people. We also urge upon the EU, ASEAN, USA and all governments and international community to pressurize the Burmese Government to stop persecution of Rohingyas and to restore their rights and freedom on par with other ethnic groups of the country.

Signatories:


Arakan Rohingya National Organisation (ARNO),
Burmese Rohingya Association Japan (BRAJ)
Burmese Rohingya Association Deuschland (BRAD)
Burmese Rohingya Association in Thailand (BRAT)
Burmese Rohingya Community in Australia (BRCA)
Burmese Rohingya Organisation UK (BROUK)
National Democratic Party for Human Rights (In Exile)
Rohingya Community in Norway (RCN)
Rohingya League for Democracy (Burma) (RLDB)



For more information , please contact:
Aman Ullah +880-15584 86910
U Hla Aung +33 -629258793
U Tun Khin +44- 788 871 4866


Download here

A Rohingya Muslim woman and her family members, who had tried to cross into Bangladesh to escape communal violence in Myanmar, cry in a coast guard station in southern Bangladesh on June 19, 2012, before being sent back to Myanmar.

 ျပန္လည္ေနရာခ်ထားျခင္းဆုိသည္မွာတႏုိင္ငံမွတႏုိင္ငံသုိ႔ေျပာင္းေရႊ႕ေနထုိင္ရာတြင္ထူးျခားေသာအေျခ

RB News Desk

ဓည၀တီ၊ ေ၀လာလီ၊ ေလးၿမိဳ႔၊ ေျမာက္ဦး ဆိုတဲ့ အမည္နာမနဲ႔ ရပ္တည္ခဲ့တဲ့ ႏိုင္ငံငယ္ဟာ အဂၤလိပ္ေခတ္မွာ အာရ္ကန္ႏိုင္ငံရယ္လို႔ ျဖစ္လာတယ္။ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံ လြတ္လပ္ေရး မယူမွီထိ အဲ့ဒီ ႏုိင္ငံငယ္ကို “ရခိုင္ႏိုင္ငံ” ေခၚတြင္ေစရမယ္လို႔ ျပန္တမ္း မရွိဘူး။ သံကြဲျမန္မာရခိုင္ လူမ်ိဳးႏြယ္ လူမ်ိဳးစု ေနထိုင္ျခင္းကို အမွီသဟဲျပဳၿပီးသာ ရခိုင္ႏိုင္ငံရယ္လို႔ အလြယ္ေျပာ၊ အလြယ္သံုးတာမ်ိဳးသာ ရွိခဲ့တယ္။ ဒါေၾကာင့္ ျမန္မာတို႔က အဲ့ဒီေဒသကို ရခိုင္ ေဒသတိုင္း၊ ရခိုင္ျပည္နယ္လို႔ လြတ္လပ္ေရးရၿပီးေနာက္ သံုးႏႈန္းေျပာဆိုေပမယ့္- တစ္ျခားတစ္ဘက္မွာ ကမၻာ ကို Arakan လို႔ အဂၤလိပ္လိုေရးၿပီး ခပ္တည္တည္နဲ႔ ေျဗာင္လိမ္ေနခဲ့ရတယ္။ အဲ့လို ခပ္တည္တည္နဲ႔ ႏွစ္ေပါင္း ငါးဆယ္ေလာက္ ေျဗာင္လိမ္ေနၿပီး- ကမၻာက အသားက်ေလာက္ၿပီထင္တဲ့အခါ- ၁၉၈၈ ေနာက္ပိုင္း စစ္တပ္က အာဏာသိမ္းတက္လာတဲ့ အစိုးရလက္ထက္ မွာမွ Rakhine State ျဖစ္တယ္လုိ႔ ေျပာင္းလဲလိုက္တယ္။ 

Burma ကို Myanmar လို႔ ေျပာင္းတဲ့အေပၚ အေခ်အတင္၊ အျငင္းအခံုေတြ ရွိေပမယ့္- Arakan ကို Rakhine လို႔ ေျပာင္းတဲ့အေပၚ ဘယ္သူ႔အသံကိုမွ မၾကားခဲ့ရဘူး။ ရခိုင္ေတြက အဲ့ဒီနယ္ေျမကို သူတို႔ရဲ႔ လူမ်ိဳးနာမည္နဲ႔ ကိုယ္ပိုင္လိုခ်င္တာ အလိုျပည့္သြားသလိုပဲ။ သမိုင္းကို ေျဖးေျဖးခ်င္း လွည့္ယူသြားတဲ့ သေဘာလို႔ ဆင္ျခင္မိဘို႔ လိုတယ္။ 

ရခိုင္လူမ်ိဳးထဲမွာ ဦးစိႏၱာ ဆိုတဲ့ ခြဲထြက္ေရးသမား တစ္ဦး ေပၚထြန္းခဲ့တာ ဦးစိႏၱာ၀ါဒီမ်ား ျဖစ္တဲ့ ဦးေအးေက်ာ္၊ ဦးေအးခ်မ္းလို ရခိုင္ဗုဒၶဘာသာကလြဲ အကုန္မုန္း၀ါဒီေတြ ေပၚလာခဲ့တာ- ဗမာမ်ား အတြက္ အႀကီးအက်ယ္ အျမတ္ထြက္သြားခဲ့တယ္။ အေၾကာင္းက- ျမန္မာဘက္က ရခိုင္ကို သီးျခားလြတ္လပ္တဲ့ႏိုင္ငံ အျဖစ္ဘယ္လိုမွ အျဖစ္မခံႏိုင္၊ ရခိုင္ဆိုတာ ဗမာလူမ်ိဳးထဲမွာ တစ္စု (သံကြဲျမန္မာ)လို႔ သတ္မွတ္ထားခဲ့ၿပီး၊ ရခုိင္မ်ားႀကီးစိုးတဲ့ ဓည၀တီ၊ ေ၀သာလီ၊ ေလးၿမိဳ႔ ဆိုတာ အေရွ႔ေတာင္အာရွမွာ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံရယ္လို႔ မေပၚထြန္းမွီ- ပ်ဴၿမိဳ႔ျပ ႏိုင္ငံတစ္ခုကဲ့သို႔သာ ျဖစ္ခဲ့တယ္- ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံရယ္လို႔ စတင္ထူေထာင္တာနဲ႔ ပုဂံေခတ္ကစၿပီး ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံထဲမွာ ထည့္သြင္း သတ္မွတ္ထားတဲ့ အရာ ျဖစ္တယ္။ အုပ္ခ်ဳပ္မႈ သေဘာတရားအရ ဥပေဒစိုးမိုးႏိုင္ေအာင္ အခြန္ ဘ႑ာဆက္သရတဲ့ လက္ေအာက္ခံအဆင့္ ဘုရင္ခြဲသေဘာ ထားခဲ့တယ္လို႔ပဲ အရိုးစြဲ ခံစားေနခဲ့တယ္။ အဲ့ဒီ ႏိုင္ငံငယ္ဟာ ဗမာမ်ားကို ေတာ္လွန္ပုန္ကန္လိုတိုင္း ဘဂၤလားဘက္ကို ပူးေပါင္းစစ္ကူေတာင္းၿပီး ဗမာကို ေတာ္လွန္ခဲ့တယ္။ ဘဂၤလားဘက္နဲ႔ ေျပလည္ခဲ့တဲ့ ေျမာက္ဦးေခတ္ရဲ႔ ေရွ႔ပိုင္း ႏွစ္ေပါင္း ၃၀၀ ေလာက္ ႀကီး က်ယ္ခမ္းနားတဲ့ သီးျခားႏိုင္ငံအျဖစ္ ရပ္တည္ႏိုင္ခဲ့တယ္။ ဒါေၾကာင့္ ဘဂၤလားနဲ႔ ရခိုင္လူမ်ိဳး ေျပလည္ေနရင္ ဗမာရဲ႔ ရခိုင္အေပၚ အခ်ဳပ္အျခာဟာ အာမခံခ်က္ ေလွ်ာ့နည္းေနတယ္လို႔ - ဗမာအစိုးရ အဆက္ဆက္က ျမင္ခဲ့ တယ္။ 

ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံအျဖစ္ လြတ္လပ္ေရး ယူစဥ္မွာ ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္ေအာင္ဆန္းက ေျမာက္ဦးပိုင္နယ္ေျမအားလံုးကို ရယူဘို႔ ႀကိဳးစားခဲ့တယ္။ လြတ္လပ္ေရးအတြက္ လန္ဒန္ကို သြားစဥ္-၊ ကရာခ်ိေလဆိပ္မွာ ပါကစၥတန္ေခါင္းေဆာင္ႀကီး မုဟမၼဒ္အလီဂ်င္းနားနဲ႔ေတြ႔စဥ္- Arakan ေဒသကို အေရွ႔ပါကစၥတန္ထဲမွာ မထည့္ဘဲ ျမန္မာကို ေပးဘု႔ိ ေတာင္း ဆိုခဲ့တယ္။ အလီဂ်င္းနားႀကီးက သားအရြယ္ေလာက္သာ ရွိတဲ့ ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္ေအာင္ဆန္းရဲ႔ သတၱိ၊ ေခါင္းေဆာင္မႈ မ်ားကို အသိအမွတ္ျပဳၿပီး- “မင္းသေဘာအတိုင္းပဲ”လို႔ လိုက္ေလွ်ာခဲ့တယ္။ 

ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္တို႔ က်ဆံုးသြားေတာ့- ေအာင္ဆန္းအက္တလီစာခ်ဳပ္ကို ဖ်က္သိမ္းၿပီး ႏုအက္တလီ စာခ်ဳပ္ကို ျပန္ခ်ဳပ္ ေတာ့ ဦးစိႏၱာ၀ါဒီ အမတ္ ဦးေအာင္ဇံေ၀က Arakan ထဲက မြတ္စလင္ လူမ်ားစုေဒသမ်ားကို ဖဲ့ထုတ္လိုက္ၿပီး ဘဂၤလားကို အလကားေပးပစ္လိုက္တယ္။ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံကို မြတ္စလင္မ်ားရာ ဘူးသီးေတာင္ ေမာင္ေတာကို ခ်န္လွပ္ၿပီး ေမယုေတာင္တန္းက စၿပီး နယ္နမိတ္ သတ္မွတ္ဘို႔ ဦးႏုကို တင္ျပခဲ့တယ္။ ဦးႏုရဲ႔ နယ္ေျမ သတ္မွတ္ေရး အတိုင္ပင္ခံအဖြဲ႔က ႏွစ္ႏိုင္ငံ လံုၿခံဳေရးအရ ေမယုေတာင္ တန္းအစား ေမယုျမစ္ကို နယ္ျခား သတ္မွတ္လိုက္ေတာ့ ဘူးသီးေတာင္နဲ႔ ေမာင္ေတာေဒသက ျမန္မာထဲကို ပါ၀င္လာခဲ့တယ္။ ဒါေပမယ့္ ဦးႏုက စစ္တေကာင္းလူမ်ိဳးနဲ႔ ျမန္မာထဲကို ပါလာတဲ့ ရခိုင္မြတ္စလင္ လူမ်ိဳးကို တစ္ေျဖးေျဖးကြဲသြားေလေအာင္- ရိုဟင္ဂ်ာ ဆိုတဲ့ အမည္နာမကို လက္ခံခဲ့တယ္။ အခ်ိန္ၾကာလာရင္- လူမ်ိဳးႏွစ္မ်ိဳး သီးသန္႔ျဖစ္သြားၿပီး နယ္ေျမ လံုၿခံဳေရး၊ တုိင္းျပည္ခ်စ္စိတ္ ခိုင္မာလာေစဘို႔ ရည္ရြယ္ခဲ့တယ္။ (လူမ်ိဳးတူတယ္လို႔ ခံစားေနသ၍ သံေယာဇဥ္ ရွိေနမယ္။ အခ်င္းခ်င္း ေဖးမေနမယ္၊ လူ၀င္ေရာမႈ ပိုမိုမ်ားျပားေနမယ္- ဒါေတြကို စနစ္တက် စဥ္းစားၿပီး ဆံုး ျဖတ္ခဲ့တာ ျဖစ္တယ္။) 

ႏိုင္ငံေရး ပရိယာယ္ကို မသိ၊ စစ္တိုက္ သတ္ျဖတ္ၿပီး အာဏာပိုင္ ျဖစ္လာသူမ်ားကေတာ့- လူမိုက္ဆန္ဆန္ မ်ိဳး ျပဳတ္သတ္ျဖတ္၊ ေမာင္းထုတ္လိုက္ရင္ ၿပီးၿပီလို႔ ယူဆၿပီး- ထင္ရာေလွ်ာက္လုပ္လိုက္ရင္ ကိစၥျပတ္သြားမွာပဲလို႔ ဉာဏ္တိုတိုကို အေရာင္တင္ခဲ့ေတာ့- ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္အေရးက ပိုမိုရႈပ္ေထြးေလေတာ့တယ္။ 

ဦးစိႏၱာ၀ါဒီမ်ားကလည္း မြတ္စလင္မ်ားကို ေမာင္းထုတ္ၿပီး ဘဂၤလားမွာ ပါသြားတဲ့ ရခိုင္မ်ားကို အစားထိုးဘို႔ အႀကိမ္ႀကိမ္ႀကိဳးစားခဲ့ျပန္တယ္။ ဗမာမ်ားဘက္ကလည္း မသိမသာလြတ္ေပးထား လိုက္တယ္။ ႏိုင္ငံေရးအရ ေလျဖတ္သူကို ေရခဲေရေလာင္းေပးတဲ့ သေဘာလို႔ ခံယူခဲ့ျခင္း ျဖစ္တယ္။ 

ဒီၾကားထဲမွာ မြတ္စလင္မ်ား အတြက္ အေျခအေနဆိုး တစ္ရပ္ေပၚထြက္လာျပန္တယ္- အဲ့ဒါက ပါကိစၥတန္က ေန ဘဂၤလားေဒ့ရွ္ အျဖစ္ ခြဲထြက္တဲ့ ပြဲပါ။ ၁၉၇၃ ခုႏွစ္ထိ ပါကိစၥတန္က ခြဲထြက္ေတာ့ ျမန္မာျပည္ဘက္ကို စစ္ ေျပးဒုကၡသည္ေတြ၊ စီးပြားေရးဒုကၡသည္ေတြ ၀င္လာခဲ့ျပန္တယ္။- ၀င္လာသူအမ်ားစုက ဘဂၤလီရခိုင္နဲ႔ ဘဂၤလီ မြတ္စလင္ ႏွစ္မ်ိဳးလံုး ျဖစ္တယ္။ ဒါကို ဦးေန၀င္းလက္ထက္မွာ ျပန္ေမာင္းထုတ္ေတာ့ ဦးတင္ဦးက ေခါင္းေဆာင္ ခဲ့တယ္။ ဦးတင္ဦးပဲ လူမ်ိဳးေရး အယူစြဲရွိေနတာလား၊ သို႔မဟုတ္ ေလျဖတ္ေနတဲ့ ဦးစိႏၱာ၀ါဒကို ဆက္လက္ေမြး ျမဴလိုက္တာလား မေျပာတတ္ပါ။ ၀င္လာသူေတြထဲက ဘဂၤလီရခိုင္မ်ားကို ျမန္မာရခိုင္မ်ားနဲ႔ ေရာေပးထားလိုက္ ၿပီး ဘဂၤလီမြတ္စလင္မ်ားကိုသာ ေမာင္းထုတ္ခဲ့တယ္။ ဒီၾကားထဲ ဘဂၤလီရခိုင္ကို ေမာင္းထုတ္ရမယ့္ အစား ရခိုင္မြတ္စလင္ေတြကို အစားထိုး ေမာင္းထုတ္လိုက္တယ္။ အဲ့ဒီမွာ အေနာက္သား ဘဂၤလီရခိုင္မ်ားကို ျပည္ နယ္ေကာင္စီမွာ လူႀကီးပိုင္းထိ ေနရာေပးထားခဲ့တယ္။ (ဥပမာ ဗိုလ္မႈးေက်ာ္ေမာင္ကို ၾကည့္ပါ။) ဒီမွာလည္း ရည္ရြယ္ခ်က္က ရွိေနျပန္တယ္။ အေနာက္သားေတြက သူတို႔ကို ႏိုင္ငံျခားသား ဘဂၤလီလို႔ မျမင္ရေအာင္ ႏိုင္ငံ ျခားသား ဘဂၤလီဆိုတာ မြတ္စလင္ေတြ ျဖစ္တယ္လို႔ သူတို႔ဘက္ကို ကာကြယ္ၿပီး သူမ်ားကို လက္ညိႇဳးထိုးတဲ့ စိတ္ရွိတယ္။ ဒီလို လက္ညိႇဳးထိုးေနေတာ့- “သူခိုးက လူျပန္ဟစ္” - စြပ္စြဲခံရသူက စြပ္စြဲသူကို မုန္း-၊ ဒီလို သံသရာ လည္ၿပီး ဗမာဆီက ခြဲထြက္ေရးကို မလွည့္ႏိုင္ေအာင္ ျဖစ္ေတာ့တယ္။ 

တစ္ၿပိဳင္နက္မွာ ဦးစိႏၱာ၀ါဒီေတြက မြတ္စလင္ကိုမုန္း၊ ခရစ္ယာန္ (အခ်ိဳခ်င္း)မ်ားကို ႏွိမ္ ရခိုင္ဗုဒၶလူမ်ိဳးႀကီး၀ါဒ ကို ရိုက္သြင္းလာေတာ့- လြတ္လပ္ေရး ဆံုးရႈံးခဲ့တဲ့ ေျမာက္ဦးႏိုင္ငံဟာ အလိုလိုေနရင္း ဘဂၤလားဘက္နဲ႔ အမုန္း ပြားေနခဲ့တယ္၊ ခ်င္းလူမ်ိဳးမ်ားရဲ႔ မေက်လည္မွဳကို ခံယူေနခဲ့တယ္။ သူ႔ကိုယ္သူ ေလျဖတ္ေနေအာင္ သူ႔ဟာသူ ဖန္ တီးေနခဲ့တယ္။ ဒီအေျခအေနကို ဗမာဘက္က အားေဆးတိုက္ေပးလိုက္ယံုနဲ႔ အိပ္ယာထဲက ျပန္ထစရာ အေၾကာင္းမရွိ ျဖစ္ေနမွာ ေသခ်ာေနတယ္။- ဦးစိႏၱာအေနနဲ႔ ရခိုင္ကို သီးျခားႏိုင္ငံေထာင္ဘို႔ ႀကိဳးစားေလ- ေလျဖတ္ေလ- ေနာက္ဆံုး ရခိုင္လူမ်ိဳးဆိုတာ တိမ္ေကာပေပ်ာက္သြားေတာ့မွာ ျဖစ္တယ္။ 

ဦးစိႏၱာ၀ါဒကို လက္ခံတဲ့ လက္နက္ကိုင္ေတာ္လွန္ေရးအုပ္စု- ခိုင္မိုးလင္းတို႔၊ ခိုင္စိုးႏိုင္ေအာင္တို႔ ဆိုတာ လည္း- လံုးပါးပါးလာကာ ေနာက္ဆံုး လူဆယ္ေယာက္ေလာက္သာ ရွိၿပီး မီဒီယာအားကိုးနဲ႔ ဟိတ္ဟန္ ထုတ္ေနရတဲ့ အဆင့္သာ က်န္လိုက္ေတာ့တယ္။ 

ဗမာမ်ားရဲ႔မူက ရခိုင္မွာ ဗုဒၶဘာသာနဲ႔ မြတ္စလင္ နဘန္းလံုးေနျခင္းကို “ၾကက္လည္းပန္းေစ၊ ယာလည္းညက္ ေစ” သီအိုရီနဲ႔ က်င့္သံုးခဲ့ျခင္း ျဖစ္ေလေတာ့့ ဦးစိႏၱာရဲ႔ ရခိုင္ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္ဟာ အိမ္မက္ထဲက စိတ္ကူးယဥ္မႈ တစ္ခု သာ ျဖစ္ခဲ့ရပါေတာ့တယ္။ 

ေဌးလြင္ဦး 

ဒီမွာဖတ္ရန္


ဦးစိႏၱာ၏ ရခိုင္ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္-အပိုင္း(၁) 
ဦးစိႏၱာ၏ ရခိုင္ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္-အပိုင္း(၂)

YANGON, Myanmar — A U.N. official has rejected a suggestion by Myanmar's president that the world refugee agency resettle or take care of ethnic Rohingyas who live in the Southeast Asian country.

U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres told reporters Thursday it was not his agency's job.

Myanmar denies citizenship to the Rohingya and considers them illegal immigrants from Bangladesh. Some have lived there generations.

President Thein Sein's website said he told Guterres in a meeting Wednesday that the solution to ethnic enmity in Myanmar's western Rakhine state was to either send the Rohingya to a third country or have the UNHCR look after them.

Clashes last month between Buddhist Rakhines and Muslin Rohingya left at least 78 people dead and tens of thousands homeless.

Sources Here:

*************************************************************************
News Updated:


YANGON, Myanmar (AP) — The U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees on Thursday rejected a suggestion by Myanmar's president that the world body resettle or take care of ethnic Rohingyas who have settled in the Southeast Asian country.

UNHCR chief Antonio Guterres told reporters it was not his agency's job to resettle the Rohingya, who live in western Myanmar but without Myanmar citizenship.

On his website, President Thein Sein said he told Guterres in a meeting Wednesday that the solution to ethnic enmity in Myanmar's western Rakhine state was to either send the Rohingya to a third country or have the UNHCR look after them.

Clashes last month between Buddhist Rakhines and Muslin Rohingya left at least 78 people dead and tens of thousands homeless. The Rakhine consider the Rohingya to be illegal immigrants from neighboring Bangladesh.

Thein Sein described the violence at the time as a threat to the democratic and economic reforms his government launched after decades of repressive rule by a military junta.

"The resettlement programs organized by UNHCR are for refugees who are fleeing a country to another, in very specific circumstances. Obviously, it's not related to this situation," said Guterres.

Thein Sein's reported suggestion to Guterres left unclear exactly how many people he had in mind. The U.N. estimates there are about 800,000 Rohingya in Myanmar. The count includes people of Bengali heritage who settled centuries ago, as well as people who may have entered the country in recent decades.

Many people in Myanmar don't recognize as legitimate settlers even those of Bengali heritage who came in the 19th century, when Myanmar was under British rule and called Burma.

Large exoduses of Rohingya to Bangladesh in the 1980s and 1990s because of persecution, and their subsequent return, also add to the confusion over who is an illegal immigrant.

Thein Sein told Guterres that according to Myanmar law, those Bengalis who settled in Myanmar before the country gained independence from Britain in 1948 and their children are regarded as citizens. However, post-independence immigrants are officially considered illegal and threatening to the country's stability.

Sources Here :

In practice, it is difficult for many people of Bengali heritage to obtain citizenship, and they face discriminatory legal restrictions on movement, marriage and reproduction.

"We will take responsibility of our ethnic nationals but it is impossible to accept those Rohingyas who are not our ethnic nationals who had entered the country illegally. The only solution is to hand those illegal Rohingyas to the UNHCR or to send them to any third country that would accept them," Thein Sein told Guterres, according to his website.

ရခုိင္ျပည္နယ္တြင္အဓိကရုဏ္းမ်ားျဖစ္ပြားခဲ့ၿပီးေနာက္အစၥလာမ္ဘာသာ၀င္မ်ားကုိၿမဳိ႕အျပင္သုိ႔အတင္းအဓမၼေနရာခ်ေပး ထားလ်က္ရွိပါသည္။ ရခုိင္တုိင္းရင္းသားမ်ားႏွင့္အစၥလာမ္ဘာသာ၀င္မ်ားျဖစ္ေသာ ရုိဟင္ဂ်ာႏွင့္ကမန္လူမ်ဳိးမ်ားသည္ ေရွးႏွစ္ေပါင္းမ်ားစြာ ကပင္အတူတကြယွဥ္ တြဲေနထုိင္လာ ခဲ့ၾကေသာေၾကာင့္မိမိတုိ႔၏မိသားစုမ်ားပမာအတူတကြရွိသည့္ မိသားစုအမ်ားအျပားရွိပါသည္။ ယခုကဲ့သုိ႔ ဒုကၡေရာက္ေနစဥ္ကာလအတြင္း မြတ္စလင္မ်ားသည္မိမိတုိ႔ႏွင့္သိကၽြမ္းေသာ မိတ္ေဆြမ်ား မွတဆင့္ အကူအညီေတာင္းခံ၍ စားေသာက္ ရန္ရိကၡာ မ်ား၀ယ္ယူရာတြင္ စစ္ေတြ၊ ေပါက္ေတာ၊ မင္းျပား၊ ေျမာက္ဦးအ စရွိေသာၿမဳိ႕မ်ား တြင္ ရခုိင္ အမ်ဳိးသား တုိးတက္ေရးပါတီမွအ လြန္တရာ လူမဆန္ စြာေႏွာက္ယွက္ေပး လ်က္ ရွိပါသည္။ ရခုိင္လူမ်ဳိး အခ်င္းခ်င္းကုိပင္နယ္ေျမ ခံလုံထိန္းႏွင့္ပူးေပါင္း၍ မြတ္စလင္မ်ား ကုိအကူအညီေပးေသာေၾကာင့္ ရုိက္ႏွက္ျခင္းမ်ား ရွိသည္ ဟုစစ္ေတြၿမဳိ႔ခံ တစ္ဦး ကေျပာသည္။ ထုိ႔ေၾကာင့္ရိကၡာျပတ္လပ္မႈႏွင့္ရင္ဆုိင္ေနရၿပီး အသက္ အႏၱရာယ္ပင္စုိးရိမ္ ရသည့္ အေျခအေန တြင္ ရွိေၾကာင္းသိရသည္။ 

ယခုလည္းေျမာက္ဦးၿမဳိ႕နယ္ရခုိင္အမ်ဳိးသားတုိးတက္ေရးပါတီမွ ဒုတိယဥကၠ႒ျဖစ္ သူဦးေအးေမာင္သန္း ဆုိသူသည္ ေျမာက္ဦးၿမဳိ႕ရွိဆန္စက္မ်ားမွမြတ္စလင္မ်ားကုိဆန္ေရာင္းခ်ေနသည္ကုိ မေရာင္းခ်ရန္ အတင္းအဓမၼဟန္႔တားသည့္အျပင္ ၿခိမ္းေျခာက္မႈမ်ားျပဳလုပ္လာသျဖင့္ ဆန္စက္ပုိင္ရွင္ မ်ားမွစစ္တပ္ကုိ သြားေရာက္တုိင္ၾကားခဲ့သည္။ ထုိ႔ေၾကာင့္ စစ္တပ္မွ ဦးေအးေမာင္သန္းအား ၎၏ေနအိမ္ မွဖမ္း ဆီးေခၚေဆာင္သြားၿပီး ေျမာက္ဦးၿမဳိ႕နယ္ရဲစခန္းတြင္ခ်ဳပ္ေႏွာင္ထားသည္ဟု သတင္းရရွိပါသည္။

ဘေလာ္ဂါ၊

Myanmar's president Thursday told the UN that refugee camps or deportation was the "solution" for nearly a million Rohingya Muslims in the wake of communal unrest in the west of the country. 

Thein Sein, who had previously struck a more conciliatory tone during fighting that left at least 80 people dead in Rakhine State last month, told the chief of the United Nations refugee agency the Rohingya were not welcome. 

"We will take responsibility for our ethnic people but it is impossible to accept the illegally entered Rohingyas, who are not our ethnicity," he told UN High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres, according to the president's official website. 

The former junta general said the "only solution" was to send the Rohingyas -- which number around 800,000 in Myanmar and are considered to be some of the world's most persecuted minorities -- to refugee camps run by UNHCR. 

"We will send them away if any third country would accept them," he added. "This is what we are thinking is the solution to the issue." 

Communal violence between ethnic Buddhist Rakhine and local Muslims, including the Rohingya, swept the state in June, forcing tens of thousands to flee as homes were torched and communities ripped apart. 

Decades of discrimination have left the Rohingya stateless, with army-dominated Myanmar implementing restrictions on their movements, and withholding land rights, education and public services, the UN says. 

Unwanted in Myanmar and Bangladesh -- where an estimated 300,000 live -- Rohingya migrants have undertaken dangerous voyages by boat towards Malaysia or Thailand in recent years. 

According to UNHCR around one million Rohingya are now thought to live outside Myanmar, but they have not been welcomed by a third country. 

Bangladesh has turned back Rohingya boats arriving on its shores since the outbreak of the unrest. 

Ten aid organisation staff, including some from the UN, were detained in Rakhine in the wake of the unrest, according to a situation bulletin by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) last week. 

Although security forces have quelled the worst of the unrest, tens of thousands of people remain in government-run relief camps with the UN's World Food Programme reporting that it has provided food to some 100,000 people.

Sources Here:

ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံသည္ ၁၉၄၈-ခုႏွစ္တြင္ အဂၤလိပ္ ကုိလုိနီလက္ေအာက္မွ လြတ္လပ္ေရးရရွိခဲ့ၿပီးေနာက္ ယေန႔ ၂၀၁၂ -ခုႏွစ္ တြင္ ႏွစ္ေပါင္း (၆၄)ႏွစ္တုိင္တုိ္င္ ျပည့္ေျမာက္ခဲ့ၿပီျဖစ္သည္။ ပါလီမန္ဒီမုိကေရစီေခတ္၊ ေတာ္ လွန္ေရးေကာင္စီ၊ မဆလ၊ န၀တ၊ နအဖႏွင့္ ယေန႔ဒီမုိကေရစီ အသြင္ကူးေျပာင္းေရးကာလဆုိၿပီး ေခတ္ အ မ်ိဳး မ်ိဳးေျပာင္းလဲခဲ့ၿပီးျဖစ္သည္။

လြတ္လပ္ေရးတုုိက္ပြဲတြင္ လူမ်ိဳးစုံ၊ ဘာသာစုံမွ ပုဂၢဳိလ္မ်ား အသက္စေတးကာ လြတ္လပ္ေရးကုိ အရယူခဲ့ သည္။  ကမာၻ႕ႏုိင္ငံ အမ်ားစုသည္ ကုိလုိနီလက္ေအာက္ခံဘ၀မွ လြတ္လပ္ေရးရရွိၿပီးေနာက္ ၄င္းတုိ႔၏ ႏုိင္ငံ မ်ား  အေႏွးႏွင္႔အျမန္ဆုိသလုိ တုိးတက္ေျပာင္းလဲခဲ့ေသာ္လည္းဲ ႏွစ္ေပါင္း(၆၄)ႏွစ္တုိင္ ရွည္လ်ားေသာ သက္ တမ္းရွိ ျမန္မာႏုိင္ ငံသည္ ေခတ္မွီ ႏုိင္ငံေတာ္ပန္းတုိင္သုိ႔ေရာက္ရွိရန္ ကမာၻ႕ႏုိင္ငံမ်ားႏွင့္ အိမ္နီးခ်င္း အာဆီယံ ႏုိင္ငံမ်ား၏ ေနာက္ဆုံးတြင္ ကပ္၍ တာထြက္လ်က္ရွိေနပါသည္။

ကုလသမဂၢ လက္ေအာက္ခံ အစၥလမ္ အဖြဲ႕တဖြဲ႕ျဖစ္သည့္ Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) အဖြဲ႕က ႐ုိဟင္ဂ်ာအေရး ႏွင့္ ပတ္သက္ၿပီး ေလ့လာ စုံစမ္းရန္ ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံသို႔ ကုိယ္စားလွယ္ အဖြဲ႕ေစလႊတ္မည္ ျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း သိရသည္။

 ဆြစ္ဇာလန္ႏုိင္ငံ ဂ်နီဗာၿမိဳ႕ရွိ ကုလသမဂၢ လူ႔အခြင့္ အေရး ေကာင္စီ ဆိုင္ရာ ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံ အၿမဲတမ္းကုိယ္စားလွယ္ႏွင့္ ေတြ႕ဆုံၿပီးေနာက္ ယင္း သို႔ စီစဥ္ျခင္းျဖစ္ ေၾကာင္း OIC ထုတ္ျပန္ခ်က္ကို ကိုးကား၍ ဘနားမား သတင္းက ယေန႔ ေဖာ္ျပသည္။ ဇူလိုင္ ၉ ရက္ကလည္း ရခိုင္ေဒသ ပဋိပကၡမ်ားအတြင္း ေသဆုံးခဲ့ေသာ ႐ိုဟင္ဂ်ာ မ်ားႏွင့္ ပတ္သက္ၿပီး တရားဥပေဒႏွင့္အညီ အျမန္ဆုံး စုံစမ္းစစ္ေဆးရန္ OIC အဖြဲ႕က ျမန္မာ အစိုးရကို ေတာင္းဆို ထားသည္။

Sources Here: