How the Rohingya crisis came to Thailand
|Coffins containing the bodies of Rohingya boat people line a local Muslim cemetery in Songkhla's Hat Yai district, after being recovered from a mass grave earlier this month in Padang Besar. (Photo by Pornprom Satrabhaya)|
By Supang Chantavanich
May 7, 2015
The discovery of detention camps and mass graves of the Rohingya in Padang Besar has shocked the public. The testimonies of the survivors have revealed the suffering that human trafficking victims have long endured.
The arrivals of Rohingya to Thailand is not a new phenomenon. There are more than 100,000 Rohingya living in refugee camps in Sittwe, the southern capital of Arakan State in Myanmar. With no hope for integration into the local Arakan community and economic opportunities, many choose to leave Arakan for a future free of persecution.
Myanmar's most recent population census revealed that the number of uncounted Rakhine State residents may reach as many as one million people, which accounts for one-third of the total population in the western coastal state. This reflects the fact that minorities, including Rohingya, were not included in the state census.
Such sectarianism has driven the exodus. In the past, earlier batches of boat people were mainly men aged 20-35. Maxime Boutry's 2014 article "The Arakanisation of Arakan: The roots of a New Exodus" describes how the profile of the boat people has changed since 2012.
Violent clashes between the local Arakanese and the Rohingya - and sectarian oppression - gave rise to new waves of asylum seekers, comprising women and newborn babies seeking to settle and work in Malaysia. People are willing to pay up to US$200 (6,620 baht) to smugglers, who converted fishing boats into small vessels, and brought them to Thai shores as a transit point during the journey to Malaysia.
It is believed the boats do not go to Malaysia directly because of the long distance and limited food and drinking water available on board for passengers. There are reports of Thai authorities pushing boats back to sea to continue their journeys onward to Malaysia. Some food and water are provided to the "irregular maritime arrivals" — a term coined by Australia for people who take to boats for migration.
The navy and immigration police are the two main agencies in charge of the controversial work. The Thai government has not announced any official policy in this regard. The UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) once requested Thailand set up refugee camps for Rohingya in the south of Thailand. But the request was eventually turned down by the Yingluck administration out of fear of negative local reactions.
The existence of jungle camps to detain Rohingya boat people is nothing new either. Rohingya people without networks of relatives or friends in Thailand or Malaysia to help them reach their destination are detained in the jungle camps along the Thai-Malaysia borders.
More money is demanded and the migrants have to contact their families in Sittwe to pay the ransom money. If the money is paid, migrants will be transferred to Malaysia. If not, the grave is often the answer.
There are three components in the definition of human trafficking: The acts, the means and the purpose. Some may argue that many Rohingya are not forced or deceived into taking the journeys.
But they are smuggled across the sea and the borders, held captive in slave-like conditions and extorted for ransom money - these conditions are adequate to consider them victims of human trafficking.
We do not know, however, if and how authorities will use these human trafficking components to prosecute perpetrators. The efficient collection of evidence for the court, and a fair criminal trial, are challenges for the Thai government to overcome.
An urgent task facing Thai authorities is the eradication of trafficking rings and punishment of traffickers. They belong to transnational organised crime networks comprising mainly Myanmar, Thai and Malay nationals with connections that stretch far and wide.
Some years ago, a group of 54 migrants from Myanmar were found dead in a fish container truck on the way from Ranong to Phuket. The perpetrators escaped legal punishment.
The anti-trafficking law was not yet effective at that time. Authorities also claimed the undocumented Myanmar migrants on that fateful truck were not yet exploited by employers because they had not yet reached their Phuket destinations. Therefore they were not considered trafficking victims.
We should learn from this tragedy to avoid the same legal traps. The trans-border human trafficking problems pose complex challenges for the government. It is entering into a labyrinth where the exit is not easy to find.
The government may want to start with measures that are within its control. For example, conducting a massive registration process and interviews of Rohingya in government detention centres would indicate its commitment to a transparent process to protect them.
The International Organisation for Migration and UNHCR should be invited to assist and witness the process.
Clear policy guidelines which balance national internal security and humanitarian assistance to the Rohingya should be developed by the state and civil society. The guidelines should assign roles to government agencies concerned, such as the navy and immigration police.
The current immigration law punishes human smugglers with only two years in jail and a fine up to 60,000 baht maximum. This is quite generous to smugglers. This needs to change.
The government should also engage in a dialogue with Myanmar and Malaysia to solve this trans-border problem.
Concerted moves to punish traffickers and protect the victims with strong political commitment and transparency can return dignity back to Thailand.
Supang Chantavanich is an emeritus professor at the Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University and director of the Asian Research Centre for Migration.