Latest Highlight


By Antoni Slodkowski and Jonathan Stempel

YANGON/NEW YORK  -- Muslim rights activists have filed a lawsuit in the United States against Myanmar President Thein Sein, accusing him and several ministers of human rights abuses against minority Rohingyas, just a few weeks before an historic general election.

The complaint filed on Thursday in Manhattan federal court accused Thein Sein and top officials of planning and instigating "hate crimes and discrimination amounting to genocide."

According to the plaintiffs, Muslim Rohingya are "subjected to genocide, torture, arbitrary detention, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment" by officials controlled by Thein Sein and his ministers.

Myanmar's government spokesman was not immediately available for comment, and did not respond to emailed requests.

The civil lawsuit was filed by Burma Task Force, a group of 19 Muslim organizations, and the Rohingya man Hitay Lwin Oo.

It seeks compensatory and punitive damages for alleged violations of the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), a U.S. law often invoked in lawsuits alleging human rights abuses.

The government will have a chance to respond to the lawsuit once it is served. It typically takes at least a few months for a judge to decide whether a case may proceed.

In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court made it harder to pursue many ATS lawsuits. It said claims must "touch and concern" U.S. territory "with sufficient force" to displace the presumption that the law does not cover non-U.S. conduct.

Myanmar does not consider the Rohingya to be citizens, rendering them effectively stateless, while denying that it discriminates against them or that they are fleeing persecution.

A tide of anti-Muslim sentiment swept through the country a year after the military ended its rule in 2011, morphing into communal violence.

At least 200 people were killed and more than 140,000, mainly Rohingyas, were displaced in fighting between Muslims and Buddhists in Myanmar's western Rakhine State.

During the flare up of the boat people crisis in Asia in May, Myanmar denied that its treatment of the Rohingya caused their exodus.

Religious and ethnic tensions are rising ahead of Nov. 8 elections in Myanmar. The government has barred most Rohingyas from voting and registering as candidates, drawing criticism from western countries and undercutting Myanmar's efforts to portray the poll as its first free and fair election in 25 years.

Myanmar has defended its decision, with its foreign minister recently comparing the situation to the United States barring foreign citizens who hold "green cards" that let them work in the country from voting in elections.

Indonesian policewomen (foreground and background right) escort two Rohingya women (foreground and background center) who are alleged rape victims to a hospital in Lhokseumawe on Sep.30. (AFP/Reza Juanda)

October 3, 2015

The Aceh National Committee for Rohingya Solidarity (KNSR) is set to report four female Rohingya refugees who claim to have been raped following medical examination results from Cut Meutia Hospital that contradict the allegations.

"Aceh has kindly welcomed the Rohingya refugees. Volunteers from various institutions as well as Aceh residents have left their own families day and night to help them. But then they lied and claimed they were raped, humiliating us, the volunteers, Aceh and Indonesia," said Aceh KNSR chief Mustafa MY Tiba on Friday as quoted by kompas.com.

According to Mustafa, the lies told by the refugees had made Aceh and Indonesia a target of abuse from the world.

"For that, we need to create a deterrent to ensure the same incident won't happen again. On Monday, we will file a report to the police to investigate the case thoroughly," said Mustafa.

He added that the committee suspected the refugees had been provoked into lying, which would explain why they dared to make such accusations and cause so much chaos at their camp.

"We suspect they were being coached to lie. The mastermind behind this must be found out and arrested," said Mustafa.

More than 200 ethnic Rohingya stormed out of their camp in Aceh on Tuesday as tensions erupted following claims of rape and torture at the site where the members of Myanmar's long-persecuted minority have been held since arriving four months ago by boat.

The incident occurred after authorities forced a female detainee to go to a hospital. Other Rohingya did not want her to leave, fearing she could be abused more if separated from the group, said Steve Hamilton, deputy chief of mission at the International Organization for Migration, who was at the scene.

Four females and six males, aged 14 to 28, said they were attempting to flee the camp on Monday night because they wanted to go to neighboring Malaysia, where a large community of Muslim Rohingya exists, Hamilton said.

Four months ago, under international pressure, Indonesia and Malaysia finally allowed the boats carrying the migrants to land and said they would temporarily host those on board until a more permanent solution could be found.

Hundreds of Rohingya ended up in Indonesia, but it was never their intended destination. They are being held in camps, are unable work and are separated from family members, including many that live in Malaysia.

Cardinal Charles Maung Bo poses with relatives during a courtesy visit to newly created cardinals on February 14, 2015 at the Vatican. AFP / TIZIANA FABI

October 2, 2015

Cardinal Charles Maung Bo gets more and more ballsy by the second.

Not only does he bust out lines like this with regularity, but he turns words into actions - like ignoring pressure from government officials who have tried to reign him in.

Yesterday, the cardinal flew to Rome for the month of the Holy Rosary in Vatican City, where he is likely to encounter Pope Francis.

Ahead of the trip, the authorities sent officials to ask him not to use the term ‘Rohingya’ to describe the persecuted Muslim minority in Rakhine state.

“They requested me not to use the term Rohingya in front of Pope Francis,” he told Mizzima News.

The government favors the pejorative ‘Bengali’, which implies the group – who have lived in Myanmar for generations – are illegal immigrants from Bangladesh.

Cardinal Bo’s not down with that.

He said he would refuse to use Bengali and will use Rohingya to “to indicate [the issue]” but would talk about the people 'Muslims from Rahkine state' because of the sensitivity over the term.

“So, the situation there is very crucial, I think we have to solve this problem before it becomes too prolonged, before there is more violence and also the worry of international terrorism and other things.”

Aye Nu Sein (L), vice president of Arakan National Party (ANP), speaks during an interview with Reuters at her party's head office in Sittwe September 3, 2015. Reuters/Soe Zeya Tun

By Timothy Mclaughlin
October 2, 2015

Myanmar's historic elections next month are likely to worsen the plight of the country's oppressed Rohingya Muslim community, with a new, hardline Buddhist party on the brink of becoming a formidable force 

The empowerment of ethnic nationalists in Rakhine State at the western edge of the Southeast Asian nation could intensify discrimination of the stateless Rohingya, thousands of whom have fled in recent years to neighboring countries. 

The government has barred most Rohingyas from both voting and registering as candidates, drawing sharp criticism from the United Nations and undermining Myanmar's efforts to portray the Nov. 8 poll as its first free and fair election in 25 years.

The Arakan National Party (ANP), an organization of ethnic Rakhine Buddhists, was formed last year. 

It lobbied hard to disenfranchise Myanmar's 'temporary citizens,' including most of the one million Rohingya living in apartheid-like conditions in Rakhine and maintains that they are illegal immigrants from Bangladesh, despite many living in Myanmar for generations. 

"This is ANP, we see, we come, we conquer," says a sign on a whiteboard at ANP's headquarters in the state capital, Sittwe. The party is handing out leaflets saying: "Love your nationality, keep pure blood, be Rakhine and vote ANP".

Rohingya make up about one-third of Rakhine's population and many are virtual prisoners in camps or in segregated villages, subject to restrictions on travel and, in some areas, access to healthcare and education.

"For the constituencies where there were many white card holders, we now have a better chance to win," said Aye Nu Sein, the ANP's vice-chairwoman, referring to the now-nullified identification cards issued to 'temporary citizens' under the previous military regime.

The ANP would like to see the Rohingya moved into camps or deported, she said.

"We don't accept the term 'stateless' being used by the international community. They came from Bangladesh, they have the same religion, race, perceptions and traditions as people in Bangladesh," she said.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has voiced disgust.

"I am deeply disappointed by this effective disenfranchisement of the Rohingya and other minority communities," he said last month. "Barring incumbent Rohingya parliamentarians from standing for re-election is particularly egregious."

In the 2010 election, three out of 29 representatives elected to the national parliament from Rakhine were Rohingya. Two Rohingya lawmakers were also chosen to be among the 35 elected members of the Rakhine regional assembly that year.

CLEAN SWEEP

But this year it may well be a near-clean sweep for the ANP.

The party is contesting all but one of the 64 seats in the national and regional Rakhine races. It is also running candidates in 14 seats outside the state. One of its aims is to win the powerful post of chief minister of Rakhine. 

"If the ANP wins the expected landslide, they will claim a strong mandate to secure the chief minister position and pursue their political agenda - including, potentially, further restrictions on the Muslim population," said Richard Horsey, an independent political analyst in Yangon.

"The ANP would also have a somewhat stronger voice than they do now in national politics, and would form part of a Buddhist-conservative bloc in the new parliament," Horsey said.

However, the Rakhines have a fraught relationship with Myanmar's Bamar majority as well. Although the Bamar are also predominantly Buddhist, Rakhines claim their region has been neglected for decades.

Both of Myanmar's national parties, the ruling Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) and the opposition National League for Democracy (NLD) of Nobel peace laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, are predominantly Bamar.

Suu Kyi is planning a trip to Rakhine in mid-October, but she will not talk about the Rohingya or citizenship issues, Win Htein, a senior member of the NLD, told Reuters.

"If we do so, they would attack us. We'll just say: 'vote NLD'," he said.

He added that the Rakhine people had become "super patriots" and conceded that the NLD faced an uphill battle against the ANP in most of the state's constituencies, where the NLD is seen as pro-Muslim and sympathetic to the Rohingya.

The ruling USDP, which is viewed in Rakhine as unconcerned with development in one of the country's poorest states, also faces long odds except in a few areas that have abundant military populations, experts say.

The ANP's popularity has been fed by a tide of anti-Muslim sentiment that surfaced after reforms started in 2011, erupting into communal violence in 2012. At least 200 were killed and more than 140,000, mainly Rohingya, were displaced in fighting between Muslims and Buddhists in Rakhine.

Rakhine Buddhists say they have little doubt who will come to power.

"ANP is the strongest party in Rakhine state," said Kyaw Lwin, a shop owner in Sittwe. "No matter how they (other parties) try, our Rakhine people will vote for Rakhine nationals."

Burma’s President Thein Sein, right, is pictured alongside US President Barack Obama as they participate in a group photo at the East Asian Summit in Nusa Dua, Bali, on Nov. 19, 2011. (Photo: Reuters)

By Lalit K Jha 
October 2, 2015

WASHINGTON — A federal court in the United States has issued a summons for President Thein Sein and several Burmese ministers to respond to allegations of human rights violations committed against the stateless Rohingya Muslim minority.

The summons was issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York following a lawsuit filed by the Burma Task Force USA, a coalition of 19 Muslim American organizations.

Thein Sein and several members of his cabinet will be in the United States this week to attend the 70th United Nations General Assembly in New York. Burma’s Foreign Minister Wunna Maung Lwin is scheduled to meet with US Secretary of State John Kerry on Friday.

Filed on behalf of three plaintiffs, all US resident Rohingya refugees who claim to have experienced torture, discrimination and displacement, the lawsuit seeks compensatory and punitive damages.

The case was submitted under the Alien Tort Claims Act (ACTA) and the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA), and charges Thein Sein and his ministers with crimes against humanity, extra-judicial killing, torture, mental and physical trauma.

“Much of the media is focused on the migrants from Syria, and understandably so, but how many hundreds of thousands of Rohingya refugees have been fleeing persecution in Burma?” asked Shaik Ubaid of the Muslim Peace Coalition, a member of the Burma Task Force.

“UN Development Goals cannot be achieved when a segment of the population of Burma is rendered stateless,” added Adem Carroll, New York Director of Burma Task Force. “A peaceful future depends on an embrace of pluralism and a rejection of the politics of fear.”

This is not the first time that a head of state has been issued a summons by a US court on allegations of human rights abuses. In late 2014, Indian Prime Minister Nerendra Modi was called to respond to a lawsuit regarding religious riots in 2002. His predecessor, Manmohan Singh, was summoned in 2013 for violations during counter-insurgency operations in the 1990s.

In both cases, the US government told the courts that the accused had diplomatic immunity as heads of state. The State Department is expected to respond similarly to the charges against Thein Sein and his cabinet.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon shakes hands with Burma’s Foreign Minister Wunna Maung Lwin ahead of the UN General Assembly in New York, September 24, 2015. (Photo: Reuters)

By Feliz Solomon 
September 30, 2015

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon calls for a credible, inclusive election and increased efforts to bridge racial and ethnic divides.

RANGOON — Burma’s upcoming general election will mark a “milestone” in the country’s reform process, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said on Tuesday, while underscoring a number of disappointing developments in poll procedures to date. 

Addressing a meeting of the UN Partnership Group on Myanmar, as the country is officially called, the secretary general stressed the importance of ensuring a “free and unfettered process for candidates and voters.” 

Delivered in New York during a session of the 70th General Assembly and in advance of Burma’s Universal Periodic Review (UN-UPR), a human rights assessment carried out for all UN member states on a rotating 4.5-year schedule, Ban’s remarks contained a number of recommendations to the Burmese government to ensure credibility of the Nov. 8 poll, which is expected to be the nation’s freest and fairest following decades of military rule. 

Addressing the disenfranchisement of hundreds of thousands of stateless Rohingya Muslims, who earlier this year had their suffrage rights revoked, Ban said authorities “must ensure that all those who were able to vote in previous elections retain those rights.” 

“The revocation of white cards is a step in the wrong direction,” Ban said, referring to temporary identity cards that allowed them to vote in previous polls. “I am deeply disappointed by this effective disenfranchisement of the Rohingya and other minority communities.” 

Last week, Burma’s Foreign Minister Wunna Maung Lwin, who was present at Tuesday’s meeting, defended the government’s decision to disenfranchise the beleaguered minority, likening their status to green card holders in the United States. 

The Burmese government and much of the population view Rohingya as illegal immigrants from Bangladesh, though many say they have lived in the country for generations. The group is denied citizenship by a controversial law passed in 1982, and is officially referred to as “Bengali.” 

“I am disappointed that the authorities have so far not been able to summon the political will for decisive action on the broader issue of citizenship,” Ban said of the government’s sluggish response to calls to normalize the naturalization process. 

Most Rohingya reside in western Burma’s Arakan State, also called Rakhine, where deadly riots broke out between Muslim and Buddhist communities in mid-2012. About 140,000 people were initially displaced by the violence, mostly Rohingya, many of whom still live in displacement camps where they are subject to restrictions on movement, education, healthcare and livelihoods. 

“In Rakhine, I am appalled by the humanitarian conditions of the Rohingya and Kaman communities,” Ban said, pointing out that those circumstances ultimately led to a regional refugee crisis

Rights groups estimate that some 100,000 people fled Arakan State by boat in efforts to reach Malaysia or other neighboring countries, many of them ending up in the hands of human traffickers. The secretary general warned that more people could attempt to make the perilous journey in the months to come, as the monsoon season comes to a close. 

More broadly, Ban raised the issue of a “rise of chauvinist sentiment” and “strident anti-Muslim sentiment… as well as antagonism against international organizations, including the United Nations.” 

In January of this year, the UN human rights rapporteur for Burma, Yanghee Lee, was met with protest upon her second visit to the country since assuming the post in mid-2014. Shortly after she departed, influential monk U Wirathu referred to her as a “bitch” and a “whore” during a public rally further fuelling a widespread perception that the United Nations was biased in favor of Muslims. 

When she returned in August, Yanghee told reporters that the government “hampered” her mandate by limiting her length of stay, denying her access to Arakan State, canceling her appointments and intimidating her interlocutors. Her predecessor Tomás Ojea Quintana also faced hostility in the country in 2013, coming under attack by an angry mob in central Burma’s Meiktila, the site of deadly communal riots earlier that year. 

“Regrettably, recent steps by the Government risk to further fan the flames of the communal divide,” the secretary general warned, referring to the recent enactment of four so-called “race and religion protection laws” propagated by Wirathu and a Buddhist nationalist movement with which he is associated. 

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has routinely rejected the implications of UN rights envoys, and has yet to make good on a commitment to establish an in-country headquarters for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). On this point Ban stated his “wish to reiterate the importance of the early establishment of an OHCHR office with a full mandate in Myanmar.” 

Also on Tuesday, a leading human rights group, Fortify Rights, issued a formal submission to the United Nations preempting the UN-UPR set to take place on Nov. 9, the day after Burma’s landmark election. The group said the submission documented “widespread and systematic torture, killings, forced population transfers, persecution, and other international crimes committed by Myanmar authorities with impunity since 2011.” 

Fortify Rights also called for the release of all prisoners of conscience in Burma. President Thein Sein came close to fulfilling his promise of freeing all political prisoners by the end of 2013, but many activists have since been jailed and hundreds now await trial, including scores of youths and their supporters jailed after a brutal March 10 crackdown on student demonstrations. 

Ban commended advances in freedom of expression and the press, but stressed that both need to be “strengthened,” adding that “actions against media and activists as well as arbitrary arrests and detention must stop.” 

The secretary general said he met with Thein Sein on Sept. 3, when he conveyed the importance of conducting and honoring the results of the upcoming election to the satisfaction of the electorate and political leaders. 

The current session of the UN General Assembly began on Sept. 15. Ban Ki-moon, a South Korean statesman, is nearing the end of his second term as secretary general after his appointment in 2007. His successor will be selected during the General Assembly in late 2016.

UN Photo/Martine Perret

September 30, 2015

The upcoming elections represent a milestone in Myanmar’s transition to democracy, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said today, adding that their credibility will depend on acceptance of its outcome among the political leaders and the broader population.

“It is crucial that these proceed in a fair, inclusive and transparent atmosphere. This responsibility rests with the Government, the Union Election Commission and the Army, but also all sections of Myanmar society,” he said at a meeting of the Partnership Group on Myanmar, held on the margins of the high-level segment of the United Nations General Assembly.

The public commitment by the Army leadership to ensure a free election and to respect its results must be honoured, Mr. Ban stated. Likewise, it is essential that the Government ensure a free and unfettered process for candidates and voters.

In addition, he noted that civil society needs space to carry out its work – and actions against media and activists as well as arbitrary arrests and detention must stop. “The authorities must ensure that all those who were able to vote in previous elections retain those rights,” Mr. Ban continued.

“I am deeply disappointed by this effective disenfranchisement of the Rohingya and other minority communities. Barring incumbent Rohingya parliamentarians from standing for re-election is particularly egregious,” he stated.

According to a read-out of the meeting, participating Member States noted the need for more decisive action on resolving the humanitarian situation in the camps for internally displaced persons and on the broader issues of citizenship for the Rohingya, adding that failure to do so could result in more suffering and loss of lives.

Concerns were expressed at the disenfranchisement of voters and rejection of candidatures, especially of Muslim representatives who had qualified for previous elections.

Ultimately, the credibility of the elections and smooth transfer of power will depend on acceptance of its results among the political leaders and the broader population within Myanmar, the read-out stated, echoing Mr. Ban, who noted that only this can ensure a smooth transfer of power.

(Photo: SERAMBI/ZAKI MUBARAK)

September 29, 2015

BLANG ADOE, Indonesia -- More than 200 ethnic Rohingya stormed out of an Indonesian encampment Tuesday as tensions erupted following alleged rapes and beatings by locals at the site where members of Myanmar's long-persecuted minority have been held since arriving by boat four months ago. 

The incident occurred after authorities forced one of the females to go to a hospital. Other Rohingya did not want her to leave, fearing she could be abused more if separated from the group, said Steve Hamilton, deputy chief of mission at the International Organization for Migration in Indonesia. 

That "caused some panic and a brief chaotic response, with Rohingya trying to stop the ambulance," he said at the scene. 

Four females and six males, aged 14 to 28, said they were attempting to flee the camp Monday night because they wanted to go to neighboring Malaysia, where a large community of Muslim Rohingya exists, Hamilton said. They said they were stopped not far from the camp by a group of Indonesian men with masks and taken into the woods, where they were beaten and three of the females were raped, including a 14-year-old. 

"When they returned to the camp, word of sexual abuse and torture committed by local residents blew up at the camp," said Lhokseumawe district Police Chief Lt. Col. Anang Triarsono. 

He said that anger boiled over Tuesday when the Rohingya surged out of the camp carrying rolls of clothes and other supplies. They were later persuaded to return. 

"We very much regret this incident and will definitely thoroughly investigate it," said Amir Hamzah, a spokesman for the district government in North Aceh. He said the females were traumatized and wanted to seek medical attention, but were stopped when Rohingya men in the camp insisted they stay. 

Immigration officials were working to identify everyone who returned to the camp Tuesday night after the tensions calmed, and some women were being examined at the hospital, said North Aceh Deputy Police Chief Maj. Irsyad Haryadi. 

"We are still investigating this serious case while waiting for the hospital results," he said. No arrests have been made, and Haryadi said it was difficult to find witnesses to corroborate the story. 

Since Myanmar opened up following a half-century of military rule in 2011, an estimated 130,000 Rohingya have fled violence and persecution, sparking the largest boat exodus in Asia since the Vietnam War. Earlier this year, the situation spiraled after a crackdown on people smugglers in Thailand and Malaysia left thousands of Rohingya and Bangladeshis stranded at sea when their agents and captains, fearing arrest, abandoned them. 

Several countries in the region refused to let the boat people to come ashore in May, worried that opening the door to a few would invite a massive influx. 

Under international pressure, Indonesia and Malaysia finally allowed the boats to land and said they would temporarily host those on board until a more permanent solution could be found. 

Hundreds of Rohingya ended up in Indonesia, but it was never their intended destination. They are being held in camps, cannot work and are separated from family members, including those living in Malaysia.



By CS Thana
September 29, 2015

Announcement of record seizure comes as junta leader Gen. Prayuth Chan-ocha prepares to speak at United Nations general assembly in New York

BANGKOK -- Thailand's Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) says it seized a record 60 million baht ($1.6 million) in assets from a trafficking network in September as it sought to clamp down on the smuggling of Muslim Rohingya from Myanmar.

The government's Public Relations Department announced in a statement Tuesday that it had seized boats, land deeds and cars belonging to the smugglers.

It added that most of the network's members were still at large. 

Of the more than 150 warrants issued in connection with the smuggling of Rohingya, only half have led to arrests, among them a Thai Army captain who turned himself in.

Tuesday's announcement was the largest haul to date of assets belonging to human trafficking networks. The previous record seizure was in August when AMLO said it had seized bonds and land deeds totalling $1.1 million -- also from Rohingya traffickers. 

Since 2012, Rohingya -- whom the United Nations consider to be the world’s most persecuted ethnic minority -- have been fleeing Myanmar in droves, in fear of violence that some human rights groups consider to be state sponsored.

Rights groups estimate that as many as 10 percent of the million-strong ethnic group have fled the country in search of better opportunities in Muslim-majority Indonesia and Malaysia.

Thailand is frequently a gateway through which migrants pass on their way south.

Following the discovery of over 30 corpses of Rohingya in jungle camps in southern Thailand on May 1, Thai authorities launched a crackdown on human traffickers, which led to the arrest of numerous suspects including a Thai general.

In the following months, trafficking boats unable to land stayed at sea, provoking a regional humanitarian crisis only solved May 20 when Malaysia and Indonesia agreed to let Rohingya and Bangladeshi come onshore and accept them as refugees.

The announcement comes as junta leader Gen. Prayuth Chan-ocha prepares to speak at the United Nations general assembly in New York.

A U.S.-based rights group has asked the assembly to take Chan-ocha to task over Thailand's repression of human rights and public liberties during his Sept. 29. speech, but Chan-ocha has said he intends to focus on his government’s achievements in fighting human trafficking.

A Buddhist nun and a woman use mobile phones while waiting at a bus -stop in Yangon, Burma. Pic: AP.

By Duncan Riley
September 28, 2015

BURMA is heading to the polls in November to elect members to the Burmese Parliament in what is arguably the freest election in years, but one with an unprecedented level of internal discussion within the Southeast Asian nation due to the exceptional local growth in social media.

Unprecedented isn’t a hard term to use with Burma (also known as Myanmar), a country that was ruled with an iron first by a military junta for some 20 years and still maintains many of the same restrictions on freedom of expression from that era today. In 2009 mobile phone ownership sat at 1 percent, a figure said to be only beaten by North Korea, and a sim card cost US$2,000 due to the regressive control of the Government. But as the country has opened its borders to the rest of the world, so to has accessibility improved; although as recently as 2013 a sim card cost US$250, by comparison today a sim card can be purchased for as little as US$1.50 and the price drop has naturally resulted in a surge in demand, with estimates that 22 million mobile phones are now active in the country, the vast majority being cheap Android smartphones from China.

Approximately 21 million people, or more if they share a phone among family members, now have internet access on their phones than did during the last election in 2012, and it is changing the way politics is played in the country, while at the same time partially bypassing the still very existent censorship laws.

Political tool

The massive increase of Burmese on social media has not been missed by either the current Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) Government nor the main opposition National League for Democracy (NLD) headed by Aung San Suu Kyi, let alone the 91 other parties running at the election, with all taking to social media, and in particular Facebook, with gusto.

Suu Kyi, best known in the West as the face of democracy in Burma due to winning the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991, has been using Facebook to encourage people to vote, including a recent video message where she said that the elections were a crucial turning point for the country and that it was important that the election was free and fair.



“For the first time in decades, our people will have a real chance of bringing about real change,” Suu Kyi said. “We hope that the whole world understands how important it is for us to have free and fair elections.”

Facebook pages such as Let’s Check Voter List encourage Burmese to (as the name may imply) check to make sure they are on the electoral roll, and also provide information about the voting process as well.

Journalists however don’t have nearly as much freedom as politicians do, although social media is giving them the opportunity to communicate directly with voters without the need to obtain Government approval as is still currently the case for traditional forms of media, but still with the ongoing risk of arrest and imprisonment.

Some restrictions on the reporting of the election are often ignored with publications such as 7Day News using Facebook and Twitter to publish stories before they hit their print edition (post Government censorship approval) and to a willing audience; 7Day has 4.1 million Facebook likes.

Partial self-censorship in utilizing social media platforms to go directly to readers is the overall theme with the Burmese media, not that it always keeps reporters out of harm’s way, with multiple arrests in 2014 under all sorts of spurious charges, such as breaching the Official Secrets Act through to in one case a journalist at the Democratic Voice of Burma being sentenced to 1 year in prison for trespassing and disturbing the peace for daring ask a Government official an awkward question.

Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, right, receives gifts from ethnic Naga women during an election campaign for her National League for Democracy party in Thamanthi township in Sagaing division, Saturday. Pic: AP.

Voice of the people

The most interesting aspect of the rise of the mobile internet and social media in Burma is that it has given a voice to an electorate in a country that is still extremely poor, with an average income of under US$200 per year.

If Burmese politicians have taken to social media with gusto, the Burmese people have taken their embrace of social media several multitudes more; even a poor rice farmer has an opinion on how the country should be run, and like people anywhere in the world they want to see their country move forward.

There have been some negatives from this embrace, not least the use of social media to spread anti-Muslim hate, but conversely there are far more positives as a result of this use.

Fortunately the Government has not cracked down broadly against individual views expressed online despite having the power to do so; after decades of speech repression it’s the average Burmese citizen that is proving the Charles Bradlaugh adage “without free speech progress is checked”.

Burma votes November 8 and you’ll likely hear the results of the election on Facebook first.

Residents stand in a queue to receive meat from Muslim people during the Eid al-Adha festival in Yangon on Sept. 25. Muslims in some of Myanmar's smaller townships say pressure from Buddhist hardliners has forced low-key celebrations this year. (Photo by Phyo Hein Kyaw/AFP)

By John Zaw
September 28, 2015

In smaller townships, Eid al-Adha celebrations are understated

Muslims in Myanmar have been forced to keep celebrations of one of Islam's major feast days, Eid al-Adha, low-key, fearing reprisals from a Buddhist hardline group pressuring local governments to ban cattle slaughters that are central to the festivities.

Local authorities appear to be targeting Muslims celebrating Eid al-Adha in smaller townships such as Yamethin and Tharzi in Mandalay Division, according to Muslim community members who spoke with ucanews.com.

"We celebrate our feast day quietly … and remind young people not to go around the town wearing nice dresses," said Aung Thein, a Muslim leader in Meikhtila in central Myanmar. "And we also have to bring meat to the town quietly after carrying out the cow's slaughter in the outskirts."

He said local members of the influential Buddhist nationalist group, Ma Ba Tha, have gone around town checking on whether cattle slaughters have taken place.

Meikhtila is no stranger to religious conflict. Tensions between Buddhists and Muslims flared into deadly violence in 2013, resulting in the deaths of 40 people, with dozens more injured.

Across the Buddhist-majority country, long-standing anti-Muslim sentiment has also triggered conflict, particularly in western Rakhine state, when violence in 2012 left more than 200 people dead and forced tens of thousands — mostly Rohingya Muslims — to flee their homes. An estimated 140,000 people in the state still live in temporary camps for displaced people.

Ma Ba Tha, or the Committee for the Protection of Race and Religion, has ratcheted up anti-Muslim rhetoric in recent months. This has raised fears that religion will be used as a political tool as the country gears up for historic elections Nov. 8 — another reason why Muslims are keen to avoid the spotlight now.

Eid al-Adha is an important celebration in Islam. The festival commemorates the story of the Prophet Abraham, also revered by Christians and Jews, who was willing to sacrifice his only son at God's command.

Traditionally, Muslims in Mandalay held public celebrations for Eid al-Adha at local mosques, where they distributed meat to needy people, according to Aung Zaw Win, a local Muslim resident.

"Now we have to do it in our homes instead," he said.

By Ei Ei Thu
September 28, 2015

Five Muslim pilgrims from Myanmar have been confirmed dead and seven remain missing following last week’s stampede disaster near the holy city of Mecca in Saudi Arabia that claimed over 700 lives, according to a local Muslim organisation.

Muslim pilgrims begin the “stoning the devil” ritual on September 25. Photo: EPA

U Ko Ko Latt, a central executive member of the Myanmar Muslim National Federation, said 3850 local pilgrims travelled to Mecca for the Hajj, including 280 people supported by the Saudi government under a bilateral agreement, as well as those who travelled privately through 41 travel agencies. Three men and two women from Myanmar were confirmed dead, he said.

The Myanmar embassy in the Saudi capital Riyadh said it was unable to confirm the figures because it did not keep track of Hajj pilgrims arriving in the country.

The confirmed death toll from the September 24 stampede at a crossroads in Mina has risen to 769, Saudi authorities said on September 26. More than 900 were injured in the crush as two vast columns of pilgrims came together near the site of a ritual known as “stoning the devil”, which has frequently been the most dangerous part of the ritual.

More than 130 Iranians were among the dead and many are still listed as missing. More than a dozen countries have reported the deaths of their nationals. Iran has accused Saudi Arabia of mismanagement and demanded that it take responsibility for the deaths.

U Ko Ko Latt said he hoped that the Saudi government would take responsibility for those killed or missing as a result of the stampede.

“We will meet and ask the Saudi embassy in Myanmar on September 28 about what actions they plan to take as a result of this incident,” he said.

According to the Myanmar Muslim National Federation, two Myanmar pilgrims were killed during a similar stampede at the Hajj in 1990.

The Myanmar embassy in Saudi Arabia told The Myanmar Times that it had no records for pilgrims doing the Hajj.

“None of the travel agencies contact and report to the embassy when they bring pilgrims to the country,” a spokesperson said by email.

Muslims officially comprise 4 percent of Myanmar’s population, but the real proportion is thought to be twice as high. Demand for Hajj pilgrimage packages is very high each year, but Saudi Arabia limits the number of visas it issues to under 4000 a year for security reasons, U Ko Ko Latt said.

He listed the names of the five who had been confirmed to have died as Daw Nwe Aye, 57, and Daw Moe Moe Aung, 34, who traveled with Multi Point Travel and Tours Company; U Kyaw Than, 47, who was on the government-to-government program; Moharmad Shar, 55, and U San Win from Dawei.

Refugees, many of whom say they are Rohingya, wait for access to the United Nations High Commission for Refugees building in Kuala Lumpur on Aug. 11. © Reuters

By Michael Vatikiotis
September 27, 2015

People are on the move across Southeast Asia, fleeing misery and violence. Just as Europe has become a favored destination for the hundreds of thousands fleeing war-torn Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq, so Muslim minorities from the eastern and western fringes of Southeast Asia are finding their way to the region's more prosperous countries in search of security and often, third-country asylum.

In the past two years, according to United Nations reports, as many as 100,000 people from Myanmar's Rakhine State have left in search of safety and security, about half of them ending up in Malaysia. 25,000 of them left in the first three months of 2015. They mostly endured perilous sea journeys in rickety boats across the Bay of Bengal; they were often smuggled into Malaysia by human traffickers, whose methods of abuse have been exposed in recent months by the discovery of abandoned camps with cages and mass graves on either side of the Thai-Malaysian border.

Over the same period, thousands of Turkic Muslim Uighurs from the western province of Xinjiang in China have found their way across Chinese borders with Vietnam and Laos, mostly with the aid of established smuggling rings. Once across the border, they head overland through Cambodia into Thailand and try to reach Malaysia, from where the vast majority of some 4,000 Uighurs, according to UN sources, have been quietly given asylum in Turkey.

Both groups are persecuted Muslim minorities, who in recent years have experienced prejudice and communal violence in areas they have inhabited for centuries. Neither Rohingya Muslims from Myanmar nor Uighur Muslims can join or integrate with existing indigenous minorities in the region. Unlike the Karen, Shan, or Kachin and other ethnic minorities from conflict- -affected Myanmar, they stand out and are more often the victim of human trafficking and exploitation for low wages.

The scourge of human trafficking has been highlighted by the revelations earlier this year of camps where Rohingya, and possibly Uighur migrants, were kept while in transit to Malaysia. Conditions were appalling, and many graves were found with evidence that migrants were poorly fed and beaten. Last year almost 300 Uighurs were found shivering with cold on a jungly hilltop in southern Thailand. They said only that they were Turkish and were trying to get to Turkey.

Action and inaction

The scenes of human misery revealed along the Thai-Malaysian border have goaded governments in Southeast Asia to take action. As a surge in boat arrivals from Myanmar earlier this year generated pictures of desperate, hungry Rohingya in filthy conditions waiting to disembark, there were promises to take them in from Malaysia, and a ripple of diplomatic activity within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations aimed at crafting a regional action plan. When the boats stopped coming with the onset of the monsoon, the problem seemed to go away -- and so did efforts to tackle the problem.

Then something altogether more chilling happened. On a balmy, rush-hour evening in September in central Bangkok, a bomb packed with ball bearings ripped through a popular Hindu shrine, , killing more than 20 people, most of them ethnic Chinese. The investigation soon revealed a link to Uighurs and a possible human smuggling operation, part of a pipeline that enables Uighurs to travel from China all the way to Turkey.

Although ongoing, the police investigation has tentatively established a link between the suspected bombers, some of whom have been identified as either Turkish or Chinese citizens, and a decision by the Thai government earlier this year to forcibly deport 109 Uighurs to China. Human rights activists fear that those deported almost certainly have faced violence at the hands of the Chinese authorities. There was a swift and angry response in Turkey where the Chinese embassy and a Thai consulate were attacked by protestors. Other countries in Southeast Asia have also deported Uighurs, but in smaller numbers, after China exerted pressure on governments to return them.

What this tells us is that migrants and the people who move them, normally for money, can potentially become instruments of terror and violence. This poses a mighty dilemma, both for the states through which they pass, and the international agencies and local non governmental organizations that seek to protect them. How then to protect people fleeing persecution as refugees, yet who potentially could turn radical and resort to violence in the countries they seek safety in?

In the name of humanity there can certainly be no dilution of already weak and poorly applied standards of protection in Southeast Asia. If anything, the lessons from the surge in boat arrivals from Myanmar and now, what appears to be an influx of Uighurs, speak to the need for escalating efforts to find regional solutions to the movement of people in distress. Steps taken by ASEAN earlier this year to tackle the problem need to be revived and invigorated. The goal should be an approach that adequately protects refugees and allows international agencies to process them to speed up safe and secure resettlement.

There is no indication that the flow of migrants is slowing down, or that the distressed areas from which they come are becoming any safer. In fact, some international agencies predict that elections scheduled in Myanmar in the first week of November could exacerbate already tense relations between Muslims and Buddhists in Rakhine State.

Both the boat crisis earlier this year and the violence possibly prompted by the deportation of Uighurs from Thailand should serve as a wake-up call, especially since the 10 ASEAN member states are due to declare the region as a common economic community at the end of the year.


Michael Vatikiotis is Asia regional director of the Center for Humanitarian Dialogue, a private diplomacy organization.






September 27, 2015

In this web extra, the key Obama adviser also says US-Cuba policy is 'irreversible'

US Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes is seen as Obama's right-hand man on foreign affairs, helping shape US policy towards Cuba and Myanmar.



In this web extra, Rhodes says the opening up of relations with Cuba is irreversible because Cubans "overwhelmingly" welcome the policy.

"For a new president to shut down an embassy that allows us to better engage the Cuban people and better advocate on behalf of human rights would make no sense," he adds.

Rhodes also expresses concern about the treatment of the Rohingya in Myanmar, calling it "an abomination".

The White House adviser also urges the Aung San Suu Kyi government "to act".



By Joshua Carroll
September 27, 2015

Free and fair elections looking less likely as complaints mount about flaws in process, including denial of vote to Rohingya Muslims and exclusion of over a hundred candidates – many Muslims

YANGON, Myanmar -- Myanmar election officials have released the final list of candidates to stand in a highly anticipated general election on Nov. 8. However, more than a hundred including many Muslims were controversially excluded from the list released this week, underlining a series of problems that threaten to damage the poll’s credibility.

More than 6,000 people will contend for regional and national seats in what is expected to be one of the freest polls in decades.

It is the first time the opposition National League for Democracy (NLD) party has agreed to contest a general election since 1990, when it won by a landslide but was not allowed to take power.

The poll comes almost five years after the start of a radical process of political and economic reforms that have lifted Myanmar out of global isolation, helped end most sanctions and spurred rapid economic growth.

If the election is largely credible it could be a significant milestone towards making the country more democratic, open and peaceful. If not there will be severe doubts about the veracity of reforms that many have already criticized as superficial.

The reformist government, which was installed by the former military junta in 2011, has pledged free and fair elections. But less than two months before polling day, that is looking less and less likely as complaints mount about flaws in the process.

Among the most serious is the disenfranchisement of hundreds of thousands of Rohingya Muslims, a much maligned minority.

The group was allowed to vote in both a 2010 poll and in 1990. Their exclusion this time around comes amid a rising wave of Buddhist nationalism.

And Muslim candidates have also been excluded from the poll. Among them is Kyaw Min, a Rohingya who contested the 1990 poll and is head of the Democracy and Human Rights Party.

Fifteen of its 18 members were denied the right to contest a seat in November on citizenship grounds.

“It’s killing the voice of the minority, particularly the Rohingya and other Muslims, and is totally excluding them from the political process,” Wai Wai Nu, a Rohingya rights activist and the daughter of Kyaw Min, told Anadolu Agency.

“It’s just discrimination against those candidates based on their religion,” she added.

In response to pressure from the U.S. and other governments, the Union Election Commission reinstated 11 Muslim candidates following an appeal, the Myanmar Times reported Friday.

Tellingly, not a single candidate from the ruling Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) was excluded during the commission's vetting process.

Another problem tarnishing the upcoming poll is that Aung San Suu Kyi, the world-famous leader of the opposition NLD, will not be allowed to become president even if her party wins a majority because she has two foreign sons.

A clause in the military drafted constitution bars anyone from the top job if they have foreign relatives, and is widely seen as aimed at Suu Kyi.

That has helped create a quirk in Myanmar’s potentially historic general election: there are no official presidential candidates, and it is unlikely the public will know exactly who is vying for the leadership until after they've voted.

The NLD has not announced who it would choose as president if it wins enough seats, and the USDP have been equally elusive.

Thein Sein, the current president, will not contest a seat, but under the constitution that doesn’t exclude him from being made president again.

In other words, Myanmar's next president can come to power without a public vote, but only if their relatives aren't foreign.

Another member of the USDP, Shwe Mann, could also be hoping for the top job. He has grown close the Aung San Suu Kyi and there is speculation she might back him.

But he was dealt a major political blow last month when Thein Sein sacked him from his post as chairman of the USDP in a dramatic ouster that saw armed security personnel surround the party headquarters.

For many analysts, the ouster meant the end of Shwe Mann’s presidential aspirations. But while he may have lost support among Thein Sein loyalists, there is no reason he can’t still be president, particularly if Suu Kyi wants him to be.

Myanmar’s president is chosen by an electoral college made up of newly elected MPs and unelected military MPs, who are granted a quarter of all parliamentary seats under the 2008 constitution.

Early next year, the upper and lower houses of parliament, as well as the military bloc, will each nominate a presidential candidate. Then the union parliament will vote as a whole on the three candidates and whoever wins will be president. The new president then forms a government.

While Myanmar state media continues to talk up hopes for a “free and fair” election, others including foreign embassies are treading more carefully, talking instead of their support for “credible” and “transparent” elections.

Religious nationalism is perhaps the biggest threat to achieving that, but another major concern is an administrative one -- voter lists across the country riddled with inaccuracies, with some even including the names of dead people.

The NLD has made a major push to update the lists, and one member has gone as far as to say that the inaccuracies could cause unrest on polling day.

Win Htein, of the party’s central executive campaign committee, told the Eleven Media website that there will be people unable to vote at “every ballot station in the upcoming general election.”

He added: “They might say bad words around the ballot station, and then there might be violence. “

Whatever happens after Nov. 8, the hardline Buddhist nationalists who are threatening the credibility of the poll are likely to maintain a strong role in Myanmar’s politics.

A monk-led group named Ma Ba Tha, also known as the Organization for the Protection of Race and Religion, recently succeeded in pushing a package of laws through parliament that rights group warn will be used to oppress Muslims and other religious minorities.

The NLD has accused the group of breaking Myanmar’s election law, which prohibits the use of religion to try and sway voters.

The party filed a complaint after Ma Ba Tha members distributed leaflets this week that said “unexpected risks will enter the religion and the country” if the NLD is elected.

Suu Kyi’s party has not, however, gone as far to openly challenge Ma Ba Tha on its campaign to marginalize Muslims or its race and religion laws. In fact populist Buddhist nationalism has gone largely unchallenged across the political spectrum.

“All the politicians and parties are silent on the [race and religion] laws and on the whole issue, including the disqualification and disenfranchisement of Muslims,” Khin Zaw Win of the Tampadipa Institute, a Yangon-based think tank, told Anadolu Agency.

“This hangs as a shadow over the elections," he added, "they cannot be fair.”

Image Credit: Luis Vazquez/©Gulf News

By Tariq A. Al Maeena
September 26, 2015

The plight of the Rohingya in Myanmar should be enough reason to galvanise an organisation comprising 57 member states to spring into action

Some global organisations have come under increasing fire for the inability to solve problems that their charter was supposed to address. The United Nations is one of them with its failure to get Israel to adhere to its many resolutions, some submitted by the UN Security Council.

For the Muslim world, an organisation was created way back in 1969 with a membership of 57 states and was called the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). It is the second largest global organisation after the UN and its members span four continents. The majority of member states come from Africa, closely followed by countries in Asia.

According to its charter, OIC is ‘the collective voice of the Muslim world to safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world in the spirit of promoting international peace and harmony among various people of the world’. The organisation’s headquarters are based in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, headed by a secretary general.

In recent times, however, the OIC has come under fire for its lack of firm and resolute actions on the fate of Muslims everywhere. The dispossessed people around the world, among them the Kashmiris and the Rohingya Muslims, find no comfort under the umbrella of this bureaucratic institution.

A week ago, an appeal was raised to the OIC by the Myanmarese Rohingya Union, asking for its intervention and assistance against the misery faced by the Rohingya people of Myanmar. In their letter, they claimed that the present government has stepped up hate-filled rhetoric against the Rohingya in various townships across Myanmar. The state has also been reshuffling sympathetic officials and drafting more anti-Muslim legislation, including the religious conversion law that denies a Myanmarese national the right to convert to Islam and denies any Muslim the right to marry a Buddhist.

In their appeal to the OIC, the Rohingya Union has also complained that the government of Myanmar has disenfranchised Myanmarese Muslims from the national election that is scheduled for November 8, 2015. This is the first time in the history of Myanmar that the Rohingya and Kamen Muslims have been denied voting rights in a national election. Further, the registration applications by Muslim candidates to contest in the national election have been rejected. A total of 42 candidates who had initially submitted their names for the voting process were denied on the grounds that ‘they are not citizens of Myanmar’.

Beginning in the mid 1960s and gathering pace in recent times, the military junta that has ruled Myanmar has been revoking the nationality certificate of Muslims and branding them as Bengalis despite their status of as an ethnic minority group with full citizenship.

Along with the rejection of their voting rights, the Muslims in Myanmar are subjected to rising racial and ethnic terrorism by the hardline Buddhist majority, whose mobs have descended and slaughtered countless defenceless Rohingya people. The letter to OIC highlights this alarming indication of “pre-planning of violence against Rohingya by Buddhist Rakhine, following the same pattern of violence against Rohingya and other Muslims in 2012 and 2013”.

The alarming signs are all there. Buddhist Rakhine communities have intensified hate speech, there is extensive movement of Buddhist Rakhine armed groups along the Myanmar-Bangladesh border, increased harassment of Rohingya by Rakhine mobs and Rakhine police, the elected officials of Rakhine state have also been making provocative statements.

Inflammatory speeches

In an incendiary rhetoric against the hapless Rohingya, U Mra Aumg, the new Chief Minister of Rakhine stated that “The ‘Bengali’ Muslims [implying Rohingya] in Northern Rakhine state are planning to commit violence against Rakhine because they are barred from the upcoming election and the Bengali Muslim terrorist groups have also infiltrated Arakan; therefore, you [the Buddhist Rakhine community] must be prepared to defend yourselves as you did in the past”. The Rohingya have a reason to be concerned. The chief minister has been travelling to various townships in Arakan state and making similar statements. There are major concerns in the Rohingya community in Arakan over the inflammatory speeches of government officials and Buddhist Rakhine leaders that are likely to set off new waves of violence against Rohingya by the Buddhist Rakhine mobs on the pretext of barring Rohingya from the upcoming election.

In their letter to the OIC, the Rohingya Union has urged that pressure be applied on the government of Myanmar to allow all the Rohingya previously holding nationality documentations to vote in the national election. They also want Rohingya, Kamen and Myanmar Muslim political parties to contest in the November 8 election. Other demands include an investigation into the hate speech by the chief minister of Rakhine state and monks and appropriate actions to prevent a volatile situation leading to further violence. They want to abolish the religious conversion and marriage laws and other legislations targeting Muslims and Christian minorities and to reinstate all their basic rights, including the right to travel, right to marry, right to education, freedom to worship and other rights.

If indeed the OIC is more than a toothless tiger, then the critical situation in Myanmar is a good ground for it to prove its mettle. A body made up of 57 nations is no joke. It is time for the organisation’s bureaucrats to sit up and take note. This recent appeal must be addressed more solidly than with a press release of little or no consequence.

Tariq A. Al Maeena is a Saudi socio-political commentator. He lives in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. You can follow him on Twitter at www.twitter.com/@talmaeena

Rohingya Exodus